Charu Chains & Jewels Pvt. Ltd., Delhi V. ACIT, Circle-6(1), Delhi

ITA 2198/DEL/2022

AI Insights

The case involves Charu Chains & Jewels Pvt. Ltd, the appellant, contesting an order by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), which dismissed their appeal as withdrawn, mistakenly assuming they had availed the VSVS for the quantum appeal. The appellant clarified that they only availed the VSVS for a penalty appeal, supported by evidence in Form No. 5. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) had erred in dismissing the appeal and agreed with the Departmental Representative's suggestion to remand the case for a fresh decision on its merits.

• Counselvise Citation: [2023] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 131160 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 7 month(s) 15 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 23-04-2023
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Next Hearing Date: 19-04-2023
• Assessment Year: 2017-2018
• Appeal Filed On: 08-09-2022
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Keywords: Competent authority
• Section: 143(3)

Judgement Text

Page | 1 INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “B”: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI C.M.GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI M. BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 2198/Del/2022 (Assessment Year: 2017-18) Charu Chains & Jewels Pvt. Ltd, 1169, 1 st Floor, Kucha Mahajani, Chandni Chowk, New Delhi-110006 Vs. ACIT, Circle-6(1), Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN: AADCC3485B Assessee by : Sh. Aman Garg, CA Revenue by: Sh. Vipul Kashyap, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 20/04/2023 Date of pronouncement 24/04/2023 O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH, A. M.: 1. This appeal in ITA No.2198/Del/2022 for A.Y. 2017-18 arises out of the order by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals), NFAC, Delhi in appeal No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022-23/1043415999(1) dated 13.06.2022 (hereinafter referred to as Ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment passed u/s 143(3) the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act) dated 21.012.2019 by the Ld. ACIT, Circle-6(1), Delhi (hereinafter referred to as ld. AO). 2. Though the assessee has raised several grounds of appeal before us, we find that the core issue to be decided is as to whether the ld CIT(A), NFAC was justified in dismissing the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn on the ground that the assessee has availed Vivaad Se Vishwas Scheme (VSVS), 2020 to settle the dispute. Page | 2 3. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. The ld AR stated with evidence that the assessee had actually availed VSVS scheme only for penalty appeal and not for the quantum appeal. The evidence filed by the ld AR in this regard in Form No. 5 issued by the competent authority very clearly states so. Hence, we find that the ld CIT(A) had dismissed the appeal of the assessee based on incorrect assumption of facts. When this was confronted to the ld DR, he fairly agreed that the matter be sent back to the file of the ld CIT(A) for adjudication on merits. Having considered the material available on record, we deem it appropriate to restore the appeal to the file of the ld CIT(A) for de novo adjudication on merits in accordance with the law. Accordingly, grounds raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes. 4. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 24/04/2023. -Sd/- -Sd/- (C. M. GARG) (M. BALAGANESH) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated: 24/04/2023 A K Keot Copy forwarded to 1. Applicant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR:ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, New Delhi