IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BENCH C CHENNAI BEFORE SHRI N.S. SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI S.S. GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. NO. 2206/MDS/2010 VEDHAPURI MANNARKOIL SRI PERIYA NAMBI THIRUMALIGAI ASTHNA SISYARGAL SABAI ARAKKATTALAI, NO.24, MUTHUMARIAMMAN KOIL STREET, THATCHANALLUR, TIRUNELVELI 627 358. PAN : AABTV2510M (APPELLANT) V. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NO.2, VP RATHINASAY NADAR ROAD, BIBIKULAM, MADURAI 625 002. (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : MS. ANUPAMA SHUKLA, CIT(DR) RESPONDENT BY : NONE DATE OF HEARING : 03 JULY 2012 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 03 JULY 2012 O R D E R PER S.S. GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER : THIS APPEAL IS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX III, MADURAI, IN APPEA L NO.C.NO.101/11/CIT- II/2010-11 DATED 01.11.2010 IN PROCEEDINGS UNDER SE C.12AA(1)(B)(II) OF THE I.T. ACT. 1961 REFUSING REGISTRATION. 2. TODAY, THIS CASE HAS BEEN CALLED TWICE. NONE HA S PUT IN APPEARANCE ON ASSESSEES BEHALF. PERUSAL OF THE CASE FILE REV EALS THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS BEEN INFORMED ABOUT THE HEARING VIDE RPAD. FACED WITH T HIS SITUATION, WE ARE OF THE CONSIDERED OPINION THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERES TED IN PROSECUTING THE CASE. I.T.A. NO. 2206/MDS/2010 2 HENCE, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF DELHI BENCH OF THI S TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN INDIA P. LTD. REPORTED IN 38 ITD 320, WE DISMISS THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR NON-PROSECUTION. 3. ORDERED ACCORDINGLY. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT AFTER CONCLUSION OF HEARING ON THE THIRD DAY OF JULY 2012. SD/- SD/- ( N.S. SAINI) ( S.S. GODARA ) ACCOUNTAT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER CHENNAI, DATED : 03 JULY 2012 JLS. COPY TO: (1) APPELLANT (2) RESPONDENT (3) CIT(A)-II, COIMBATORE (4) CIT-III, COIMBATORE (5) D.R. (6) GUARD FILE