IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 221/SRT/2018 (AY 2008-09) (H EARING IN VIRTUAL COURT) ABBAS N SHAIKH PROP. R.A. SHAIKH PACKAGING) PLOT NO. 49, S NO. 126/P, AMLI SILVASSA, DADRA & NAGAR HAVELI. PAN : AHHPS 2732 F VS ITO, SILVASSA WARD SILVASSA. APPLICANT RESPONDENT ASSESSEE BY SH. A.GOPALKRSIHNAN CA REVENUE BY MISS ANUPMA SINGLA SR. DR DATE OF HEARING 09.06.2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 09.06.2021 ORDER UNDER SECTION 254(1) OF INCOME TAX ACT PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER : 1. THIS APPEAL BY ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDERS OF LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), VALSAD, DATED 21.08.2018, FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR (AY) 2008-09. THE APPEAL CAME UP HEARING ON 09 TH JUNE 2021. PERUSAL OF RECORD SHOWS THAT THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED AN APPLICATION ON 08 TH JUNE 2021 INTER ALIA STATING THEREIN THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS AVAILED THE BENEFITS OF VIVAD SE VISVAS SCHEME -2020 (VSV-20) AND HAS RECEIVED FORM-3 OF VSV-20. THE ASSESSEE ALSO FILED COPY OF FORM-3 BEARING ACKNOWLEDGEMENT NO. 359681690190620 DATED 19.06.2020 FROM DESIGNATED AUTHORITY AND PRAYED FOR WITHDRAWAL OF APPEAL. THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE PAYED FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL. ITA NO. 221/SRT/2018 ABBAS N SHAIKH (AY 2008-09) 2 2. ON THE OTHER HAND THE LEARNED SENIOR DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE (SR DR) SUBMITS THAT SHE HAS NO OBJECTION IF THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 3. WE HAVE CONSIDERED THE CONTENTS OF THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AND THE SUBMISSIONS OF SR DR FOR THE REVENUE. CONSIDERING THE FACTS THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS SETTLED THE DISPUTE WITH THE DEPARTMENT FOR ASSESSMENT BY AVAILING THE BENEFIT OF SCHEME UNDER VSV-20, AND HAS RECEIVED FORM-3 OF VSV -20, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN WITH LIBERTY TO THE ASSESSEE AS WELL AS TO THE REVENUE THAT IN CASE, IF THE APPLICATION PREFERRED BY THE ASSESSEE UNDER VSV-20 DOES NOT GET FINALLY SETTLED FOR ANY REASON WHATSOEVER, THEN BOTH THE PARTIES ARE AT LIBERTY TO PREFER MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL FOR RESTORATION OF THIS APPEAL OR ANY FURTHER DIRECTION AND IN SUCH EVENT, THE APPEALS SHALL GET RESTORED . 4. THE ASSESSING OFFICER IS DIRECTED TO PASS CONSEQUENTIAL ORDER AS PER CBDT CIRCULAR NO. 3/2021 DATED 04.03.2021. IN THE RESULT THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER ANNOUNCED AT THE TIME OF HEARING OF APPEAL ON 09 TH JUNE 2021 IN THE VIRTUAL COURT HEARING. SD/- SD/- ( DR ARJUN LAL SAINI) (PAWAN SINGH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER SURAT, DATED: 09/06/2021 (SELF) ITA NO. 221/SRT/2018 ABBAS N SHAIKH (AY 2008-09) 3 COPY TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT(A) 4. CIT 5. DR 6. GUARD FILE BY ORDER / / TRUE COPY / / ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, ITAT, SURAT