IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL C BENCH, B ENGALURU BEFORE S HRI SUNIL KUMAR YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I TA NO. 2217 / BANG/2 0 1 7 (ASSESSMENT YEAR: 20 1 1 - 12 ) SHRI VEERAMACHANENI RAGHAVENDRA PRASAD, PRO. M/S .RAGHAVENDRA AUTOMOBILES, PB ROAD, G M COMPOUND, DAVANGERE. PAN: AFUPP1638F VS. APPELLANT DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME - TAX, CIRCLE 1, DAVANGERE. RESPONDENT APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : DR P.V.PRADEEP KUMAR, ADDL.CIT DATE OF HEARING : 24/04/2018 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 31 /05/2018 O R D E R PER I NTURI RAMA RAO, AM : THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A) - IV, BENGALURU, DATED 16/10/2012 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008 - 07. 2. WHEN THE APPEAL WAS CALLED UP FOR HEARING, NOBODY APPEARED FOR ASSESSEE. IT IS SEEN FROM RECORDS THAT IN SPITE OF THE DATE OF HEARING BEING MENTIONED IN THE NOTICE OF HEARING, WHICH HAS BEEN ISSUED AND SERVED ON THE ASSESSEE BY REGISTERED POST ACKNOWLEDGEMENT DUE, NOBODY WAS PRESENT ON THE DATE OF HEARING. IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, WE ARE OF THE OPINION THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING ITS CASE. WE DISMISS THE APPEAL FOLLOWING ITA NO. 2217/BANG/2017 PAGE 2 OF 2 THE DECISION OF THE DELHI BENCH OF THE ITAT IN CIT V . MULTIPLAN INDIA P.LTD., (1991) 38 ITD 320 AND OF THE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJI RAO HOLKAR V. CWT (1997) 223 ITR 480, AS THE APPEAL IS INFRUCTUOUS FOR NON - PROSECUTION. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 31 ST MAY, 2018 SD/ - SD/ - (SUNIL KUMAR YADAV) (INTURI RAMA RAO) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER PLACE : BENGALURU. D A T E D : 31/05/2018 SRINIVASULU, SPS COPY TO : 1 APPELLANT 2 RESPONDENT 3 CIT(A) 4 CIT 5 DR, ITAT, BA NGALORE. 6 GUARD FILE BY ORDER SENIOR PRIVATE SECRETARY INCOME - TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE