ASEEM POWER TEKNEEKS P. LTD, MUMBAI V. ITO WD 9(1)(1), MUMBAI

ITA 2220/MUM/2009

• Counselvise Citation: [2010] 136 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 7388 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 10 month(s) 26 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 05-03-2010
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Next Hearing Date: 02-03-2010
• Assessment Year: 2001-2002
• Appeal Filed On: 09-04-2009
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH SMC BEFORE SHRI R.S. SYAL (AM) I.T.A.NO. 2220/MUM/09 (ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2001-02) M/S. ASEEM POWER TEKNEEKS P LTD. 231/8, JAWAHAR NAGAR OPP. MOUNT MERRY SCHOOL GOREGAON WEST MUMBAI-400 062. VS. ITO WARD 9(1)(1) AAYAKAR BHAVAN M.K. ROAD MUMBAI-400 020. APPELLANT RESPONDENT PAN/GIR NO. : AABCA3890N ASSESSEE BY : NONE DEPARTMENT BY : SHRI S.M. KESHKAMAT ORDER THIS IS AN APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDE R OF THE LEARNED CIT(A)-IX, MUMBAI DATED 21.1.2009 FOR A.Y. 2001-02. 2. ON THE DATE OF HEARING OF THIS APPEAL I.E. ON 2. 3.2010 NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. UNDER THESE CIR CUMSTANCES, IT IS INFERRED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PRO SECUTING THIS APPEAL. THIS DECISION IS ALSO SUPPORTED BY THE DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN INDIA (P) LTD., 38 ITD 320. ACCOR DINGLY, I TREAT THIS APPEAL AS UN-ADMITTED AND DISMISS THE SAME IN LIMIN E. 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISS ED ORDER HAS BEEN PRONOUNCED ON 5 TH DAY OF MARCH, 2010. SD/- (R.S. SYAL) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED : 5 TH MARCH, 2010 2 COPY TO : 1. THE ASSESSEE 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. THE CIT(A)-CONCERNED. 4. THE CIT, CONCERNED. 5. THE DR CONCERNED, MUMBAI 6. GUARD FILE BY ORDER TRUE COPY ASSTT. REGISTRAR, ITAT, MUMBAI PS