IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH F, NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SH. AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) ITA NO.223/DEL/2018 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2013-14 RAJNI GUPTA A-8, DEV ASHREY, SHAMBHU NAGAR, MEERUT PAN : ABQPB 2575 C VS. ACIT CIRCLE -2, MEERUT (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) A SSESSEE BY SH. RAMIT KAKKAR, ADV. RE VENUE BY SMT. SUSHMA SINGH, CIT - DR DATE OF HEARING: 15 /0 2 /202 1 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 15 /0 2 /202 1 ORDER PER ANIL CHATURVEDI, AM: THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 31.10.2017 OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), MEERUT RELATING TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-14. 2. BEFORE US, ASSESSEE HAS MOVED AN APPLICATION WHEREIN THE ASSESSEE HAS STATED THAT IT HAS OPTED FOR VIVAD SE VISHWAS (VSV) 2020 AND HAS FILED THE DECLARATION (FORM-1) AND UNDERTAKING ITA NO. 223/DEL/2018 RAJNI GUPTA VS. ACIT A.Y. 2013-14 2 (FORM-2) SCHEME AND DEPARTMENT HAD ISSUED FORM-3 AND HAD REQUESTED TO ALLOW THE WITHDRAWAL OF APPEAL. 3. AFTER CONSIDERING THE REQUEST MADE BY THE ASSESSEE, WE DISMISS THE APPEAL OF ASSESSEE AS WITHDRAWN SUBJECT TO A CAVEAT THAT IN CASE THE DISPUTE RELATING TO TAX ARREARS FOR THE CAPTIONED ASSESSMENT YEAR IS NOT ULTIMATELY RESOLVED IN TERMS OF THE AFORESAID ACT, THE ASSESSEE SHALL BE AT LIBERTY TO APPROACH THE TRIBUNAL FOR REINSTITUTION OF THE APPEAL AND THE TRIBUNAL SHALL CONSIDER SUCH APPLICATION APPROPRIATELY AS PER LAW. WITH THESE DIRECTIONS, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 4. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 15.02.2021, IMMEDIATELY AFTER CONCLUSION OF THE HEARING OF THE MATTER IN VIRTUAL MODE. SD/- SD/- (AMIT SHUKLA) (ANIL CHATURVEDI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATE:- 15.02.2021 *PRITI YADAV, SR.PS* COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(APPEALS) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI