Shri Kishorbhai Kanjibhai Thakkar, Surat V. The Income Tax Officer,Ward-5(2), Surat

ITA 2241/AHD/2015

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 108 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 7500 (ITAT-SURAT)
• Duration Of Justice: 5 year(s) 8 month(s) 8 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 05-04-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Next Hearing Date: 28-06-2017
• Assessment Year: 2008-2009
• Appeal Filed On: 28-07-2015
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: O P VAISHNAV
• Assessee Lawyers: MEHUL PATEL

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 2241/AHD/2015 (AY: 2008-09) ( VIRTUAL COURT HEARING) KISHORBHAI KANJIBHAI THAKKAR, AMIT STEEL CENTRE, 9/166-A, KELAPITH CHAUTA BAZAR, SURAT. PAN : AAWPT1313P VS. THE ITO, WARD-5(2), SURAT. APPELLANT RESPONDEDNT APPELLANT BY SHRI MEHUL PATEL, AR RESPONDENT BY SHRI O. P. VAISHNAV, SR. DR DATE OF HEARING 05/04/2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 05/04/2021 O R D E R PER DR. A. L. SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER : AT THE OUTSET ITSELF, SHRI MEHUL PATEL, LEARNED AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE (IN SHORT THE LD. AR) FOR THE ASSESSEE, SUBMITTED BEFORE THE BENCH THAT ASSESSEE HAS OPTED THE BENEFIT OF THE DIRECT TAX VIVAD SE VISHWAS ACT, 2020 . A COPY OF FORM NO. 3 UNDER THE DIRECT TAX VIVAD SE VISHWAS ACT, FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IN THE INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT ON 11.02.2021 WAS ALSO PLACED BEFORE THE BENCH. SHRI MEHUL PATEL, ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE, BY WAY OF A LETTER DATED 03.04.2021, SUBMITTED THAT ASSESSEE HAS PRAYED FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL TO WHICH, THE LEARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE (IN SHORT THE LD. DR) DID NOT RAISE ANY OBJECTION. 2. WE HAVE HEARD BOTH THE PARTIES AND GONE THROUGH THE FORM NO.3 ALONG WITH ACKNOWLEDGEMENT NO.250918430110221 FILED BY THE ASSESSEE TO OBTAIN THE BENEFIT OF VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME AND NOTED THAT ASSESSEE HAS PRAYED FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL. THE LD. DR FOR THE REVENUE DID NOT HAVE ANY OBJECTION IF THE SAID APPEAL IS WITHDRAWN BY THE ASSESSEE. CONSEQUENTLY, WE TREAT THIS APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN. THE ASSESSING OFFICER IS 2 ITA NO.2241/AHD/2015 ASSESSMENT YEAR.2008-09 KISHORBHAI KANJIBHAI THAKKAR DIRECTED TO PASS THE CONSEQUENTIAL ORDER AS PER CBDT CIRCULAR NO.03/2021 DATED 04.03.2021. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE (IN ITA NO.2241/AHD/2015 FOR AY.2008-09) IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON 05/04/2021 AT THE TIME OF VIRTUAL COURT HEARING. SD/- SD/- (PAWAN SINGH) (DR. A. L. SAINI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SURAT, DATED: 05/04/2021 SAMANTA COPY TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT(A) 4. CIT 5. DR 6. GUARD FILE /TRUE COPY/ BY ORDER // TRUE COPY // ASSISTANT REGISTRAR/SR. PS/PS ITAT, SURAT