M/s. Telsima Communications Private Limited, Delhi V. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle- 12(4), Bangalore

ITA 2241/BANG/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2020] 110 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 7887 (ITAT-BANGALORE)
• Duration Of Justice: 10 month(s) 5 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 28-08-2020
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Next Hearing Date: 17-09-2020
• Assessment Year: 2007-2008
• Appeal Filed On: 23-10-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Assessee Lawyers: G VAIDEHI

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N. V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI A. K. GARODIA , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER IT (TP) A NO. 224 1 /BANG/20 1 9 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2007-08 M/S. TELSIMA COMMUNICATIONS PVT. LTD., 1 ST FLOOR SALARPURIA TOUCHSTONE, MARATHAHALLI, SARJAPUR OUTER RING ROAD, KADUBEENSANAHALLI, BENGALURU 560 103. PAN : A ABCT 982 6 D VS. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE 12(4),BENGALURU (JURISDICTIONAL ASSESSING OFFICER DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 7(1)(1), BENGALURU) . APPELLANT RESPONDENT ASSESSEE BY : SMT. G. VAIDEHI , CA REVENUE BY : SHRI. S. SUNDAR RAJAN, ADDL. CIT , CIT (DR)(ITAT), BENGALURU DATE OF HEARING : 2 6 .0 8 .2020 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 28 .0 8 .2020 O R D E R PER A. K. GARODIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: THIS APPEAL IS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AND THE SAME IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF LEARNED CIT(A)-7, BENGALURU, DATED 08.08.2019, FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08. 2. IN THIS APPEAL, THE ASSESSEE HAS RAISED VARIOUS GROUNDS BUT IN THE COURSE OF HEARING, IT IS SEEN THAT ON 14.08.2020, THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED A LETTER IN WHICH IT IS STATED THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS OPTED TO FILE AN APPLICATION UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS ACT, 2020 AND THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED FORM 1 OF THE SAID ACT AND ALSO FILED A LETTER BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL ON 14.08.2020 IN WHICH IT IS STATED BY THE ASSESSEE THAT THE ASSESSEE INTENDS TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. IT(TP)A NO. 2241/BANG/2019 PAGE 2 OF 2 IT IS STATED BY THE ASSESSEE IN THE PRESENT APPLICATION THAT THE PRESENT APPEAL MAY BE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. LEARNED DR OF THE REVENUE HAD NO OBJECTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL. 3. THE ASSESSEE IS PERMITTED TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL AND THE SAME IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 4. IN THE RESULT, ASSESSEES APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THE DATE MENTIONED ON THE CAPTION PAGE. SD/- SD/- (N. V. VASUDEVAN) (A.K. GARODIA) VICE PRESIDENT ACCOUNTANT MEMBER BANGALORE, DATED: 28 TH AUGUST, 2020. /NS/* COPY TO: 1. APPELLANTS 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT, BANGALORE. 6. GUARD FILE BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, ITAT, BANGALORE.