ACIT, Rohtak Circle , Rohtak V. Sarva Haryana Gramin Bank, Rohtak

ITA 225/DEL/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2022] 105 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 9180 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 29 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 08-02-2022
• Appeal Filed By: Department
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: G
• Assessment Year: 2012-2013
• Appeal Filed On: 10-01-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: PARMITA BISWAS

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : G : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI N.K. CHOUDHRY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.225/Del/2019 Assessment Year: 2012-13 ACIT, Rohtak Circle, Rohtak. Vs Sarva Haryana Gramin bank, Plot No.1, Sector-3, Rohtak, Haryana. PAN: AAKAS1464M (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Vivek Gupta, Advocate Revenue by : Mrs. Parmita Biswas, CIT, DR CORRIGENDUM It has come to our notice that in the order pronounced on 09.02.2022 in the above case, some mistakes have crept in which are corrected by this Corrigendum. 2. In para No.3, the sentence, “He accordingly submitted that the grounds raised by the assessee should be allowed” may be read as, “He accordingly submitted that the grounds raised by the Revenue should be dismissed.” 3. In para No.5, the sentence, “Accordingly, the grounds raised by the assessee are allowed” may be read as, “Accordingly, the grounds raised by the Revenue are dismissed.” ITA No.225/Del/2019 2 4. Para No.6 may be read as, “In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed.” 5. Date of order may be read as “9 th February, 2022” instead of “9 th February, 2021.” Sd/- Sd/- (N.K. CHOUDHRY) (R.K. PANDA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated: 14 th February, 2022. dk Copy forwarded to : 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR Asstt. Registrar, ITAT, New Delhi