IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD D BENCH AHMEDABAD , MH BEFORE SHRI SHAILEND RA KUMAR YADAV, JUDI CIAL MEMBER, AND SHRI ANIL CHATURVEDI , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER . ITA. NO. 2 253 /AHD/20 11 (ASSESSM ENT YEAR: 200 4 - 0 5 ) 20 MICRONS LIMITED 307 - 308 ARUNDEEP COMPLEX, RACE COURSE, VADODARA - 390007 APPELLANT VS. ACIT, CIRCLE - 4, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, RACE COURSE, VADODARA RESPONDENT PAN: AAACZ0580B / BY APPELLANT : NONE / BY RESPONDENT : SMT. SONIA KUMAR, SR. D.R. / DATE OF HEARING : 22 . 0 4 .2015 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 24 . 0 4 .201 5 ORDER PER SHAILENDRA KUMAR YADAV, J.M: THI S APPEAL HAS BEE N FILED BY ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) - III, BARODA , DATED 1 0.0 6 .2011 FOR A.Y. 200 4 - 0 5 . I T A NO. 2 253 /AHD/ 11 A.Y. 200 4 - 0 5 [ 20 MICRONS LIMITED VS, ACIT ] PAGE 2 2. AT THE OUT SET, IT IS SEEN FROM THE RECORDS THAT NOTICE HAS B EEN ISSUED TO THE ASSESSEE ON 2 7 .0 2 .201 5 HOWEVER, ON THE DATE OF HE ARING I.E. 2 2 .0 4 .201 5 NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF ASSESSEE NOR FILED ANY ADJOURNMENT PETITION. THIS SHOWS THAT ASSESSEE IS N OT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THIS APPEAL. 2 . 1 IN VIEW OF THESE FACTS, IT IS CLEAR THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTI N G THIS APPEAL, AND ACCORDINGLY, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE MULTIPLAN (INDIA) (P) LTD., (38 ITD 320), WE DISMISS THIS APPEAL FILED BY ASSESSEE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 3 . IN THE RESULT, APPEAL FILED BY ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED FOR NON PROSECUTION. PRONO UNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THIS THE 24 TH DAY OF APRIL , 201 5 . SD/ - SD/ - (ANIL CHATURVEDI) (SHAILENDRA KUMAR YADAV) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER AHMEDABAD: DATED 24 /0 4 /2015 S.K.SINHA / COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO: - 1. / REVENUE 2. / ASSESSEE 3. / CONCERNED CIT 4. - / CIT (A) 5. , , / DR, I TAT, AHMEDABAD 6. / GUARD FILE. BY ORDER / , / ,