, C IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL C BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER ./ I.T.A. NO. 2264/AHD/2017 ( ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2013-14) THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 2(1)(2), AHMEDABAD 1 ST FLOOR, NAVJIVAN TRUST BLDG. OFF. ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD / VS. MAHADEV PULSES PVT. LTD. 45/2, KABUTAR KHANA, CHOKHA BAZAR, KALUPUR, AHMEDABAD - 380001 ./ ./ PAN/GIR NO. : AADCM6647B ( APPELLANT ) .. ( / RESPONDENT ) / APPELLANT BY : SHRI L. P. JAIN, SR.D.R. / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI KRUTESH PATEL, A.R. DATE OF HEARING 01/07/2019 !'# / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 08/07/2019 / O R D E R PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA - AM: THE CAPTIONED APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED AT THE INSTANCE OF THE REVENUE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF IN COME TAX (APPEALS)-2, AHMEDABAD (CIT(A) IN SHORT), DATED 0 8.08.2017 ITA NO. 2264/AHD/17 [ACIT VS. MAHADEV PULSES PVT. LTD.] A.Y. 2013-14 - 2 - ARISING IN THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 25.02.2016 PA SSED BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER (AO) UNDER S. 143(3) OF THE INCOM E TAX ACT, 1961 (THE ACT) CONCERNING AY 2013-14. 2. THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL RAISED BY THE REVENUE REA D AS UNDER:- 1. THE LD CIT(A) ERRED IN LAW AND ON FACTS IN CONS IDERING THE ACTIVITY OF THE ASSESSEE TO BE AN INTEGRATED BUSINESS ELIGIBLE FOR DEDUCTION U/S 80(IB)(11A) OF THE ACT. 3. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, IT WAS SUBMITTED BY THE LD.AR FOR THE ASSESSEE THAT THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE I S HIT BY RECENTLY ISSUED CBDT CIRCULAR NO.3 OF 2018 DATED 11/07/2018 REVISING THE PREVIOUS THRESHOLDS PERTAINING TO TAX EFFECTS. AS PER AFORESAID CIRCULAR, ALL PENDING APPEALS FILED BY REVENUE ARE LIABLE TO BE DISMISSED AS A MEASURE FOR REDUCING LITIGATION WHER E THE TAX EFFECT DOES NOT EXCEED THE PRESCRIBED MONETARY LIMIT WHICH IS NOW REVISED AT RS.20 LAKHS. IN THE INSTANT CASE, THE T AX EFFECT ON THE DISPUTED ISSUES RAISED BY THE REVENUE IS STATED TO BE NOT EXCEEDING RS.20 LAKHS AND THEREFORE APPEAL OF THE R EVENUE IS REQUIRED TO BE DISMISSED IN LIMINE . 4. THE LEARNED DR FOR THE REVENUE FAIRLY ADMITTED T HE APPLICABILITY OF THE CBDT CIRCULAR NO. 3 OF 2018. A CCORDINGLY, APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISMISSED AS NOT MAINTAINA BLE. HOWEVER, ITA NO. 2264/AHD/17 [ACIT VS. MAHADEV PULSES PVT. LTD.] A.Y. 2013-14 - 3 - IT WILL BE OPEN TO THE REVENUE TO SEEK RESTORATION OF ITS APPEAL ON SHOWING INAPPLICABILITY OF THE AFORESAID CBDT CIRCU LAR IN ANY MANNER. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISM ISSED. SD/- SD/- (MAHAVIR PRASAD) (PRADIP KUMA R KEDIA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AHMEDABAD: DATED 08/07/2019 TRUE COPY S. K. SINHA !'#' / COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO:- &. / REVENUE 2. / ASSESSEE (. )*+ , / CONCERNED CIT 4. ,- / CIT (A) /. 012 33*+4 *+#4 56) / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 7. 289 : / GUARD FILE. BY ORDER / 4 /5 *+#4 56) THIS ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 08/07/2019