, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL D BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI S.S. GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER ./ ITA NO. 2271/AHD/2012 / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2009-2010 ACIT, CIRCLE-9, SURAT VS. M/S. SAKET IMPEX, 201, PRINCESS PLAZA, VARACHHA ROAD, SURAT-395006 PAN: AAQFS 1516 B / (APPELLANT) / (RESPONDENT) REVENUE BY : SHRI JAYANT JAVERI, SR DR ASSESSEE BY : SHRI M.K. PATEL, AR / DATE OF HEARING : 09/11/2016 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 10/11/2016 / O R D E R PER N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: THIS APPEAL BY THE REVENUE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (APPEALS)-V, SURAT DATED 11.07.2012 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10. 2. THE GROUNDS RAISED BY THE REVENUE IN ITS APPEAL READ AS UNDER:- 1. ON THE FACTS AND IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE A ND IN LAW, THE CIT(A) HAS ERRED IN DELETING THE ADDITION MADE BY THE ASSE SSING OFFICER OF RS.11,441/- WITHOUT APPRECIATING THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS NEITHER PROVED WITH EVIDENCE NOR FURNISHED NECESSARY JUSTIF ICATION FOR GIVING INTEREST FREE LOAN TO THE FRIEND OF A PARTNER OF TH E FIRM. 2. ON THE FACTS AND IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE A ND IN LAW, THE CIT(A) HAS ERRED IN DELETING THE ADDITION MADE BY THE ASSE SSING OFFICER OF RS.7,99,000/- WITHOUT APPRECIATING THE FACT THAT TH E SAID LOSSES WERE NOTIONAL LOSSES WHICH ARE NOT ALLOWABLE AS DEDUCTIO N. 3. ON THE FACTS AND IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE A ND IN LAW, THE CIT(A) HAS ERRED IN DELETING THE ADDITION MADE BY THE ASSE SSING OFFICER OF ITA NO. 2271/AHD/2012 ACIT VS. SAKET IMPEX AY 2009-2010 2 RS.1,89,791/- WITHOUT APPRECIATING THE FACT THAT TH E SAID INTEREST WAS NOT REFLECTED IN 26AS REPORT. 3. AT THE OUTSET, THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE SUBMITTED THAT THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE NEEDS TO BE DISMISSED ON ACCO UNT OF LOW TAX EFFECT IN VIEW OF THE CBDT CIRCULAR NO.21 OF 2015 DATED 10.12 .2015. THE LD. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE FAIRLY ADMITTED THAT TH E TAX EFFECT IS LESS THAN THE LIMIT PRESCRIBED BY THE AFORESAID CBDT CIRCULAR . 4. WE HAVE HEARD BOTH THE PARTIES AND PERUSED THE M ATERIAL AVAILABLE ON RECORD. WE FIND THAT PRIMA-FACIE THIS APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS NOT MAINTAINABLE IN VIEW OF CBDT CIRCULAR NO. 21/2015 I N F.NO.279/MISC. 142/2007-ITJ (PT) DATED 10TH DECEMBER 2015, VIDE WH ICH IT HAS BEEN PROVIDED THAT IF THE TAX EFFECT BY VIRTUE OF THE CO MMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (APPEALS)S ORDER IS BELOW RS. 10 LACS, THEN THAT O RDER WOULD NOT BE CHALLENGED BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL IN FURTHER APPEAL. THE BOARD HAS PROVIDED EXEMPTIONS AT CLAUSE (8) OF THE INSTRUCTIONS WHEREI N IT HAS BEEN PROVIDED THAT THESE INSTRUCTIONS WILL NOT BE APPLICABLE, IF VIRES OF ANY PROVISIONS HAS BEEN QUASHED BY IMPUGNED ORDER OR ADDITION WAS MADE ON SOME AUDIT OBJECTIONS OR THE ADDITION RELATES TO UNDISCLOSED F OREIGN ASSETS/BANK ACCOUNTS, ETC. WE FIND THAT THE PRESENT CASE DOES NOT FALL WITHIN THE EXEMPTION CLAUSE AND THE TAX IS LESS THAN RS.10 LAC S. THEREFORE, THE PRESENT APPEAL IS NOT MAINTAINABLE AND HENCE DISMISSED. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE I S DISMISSED IN LIMINE. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON 10 TH NOVEMBER, 2016 AT AHMEDABAD. SD/- SD/- (S.S. GODARA) JUDICIAL MEMBER (N.K. BILLAIYA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AHMEDABAD; DATED 10/11/2016 BIJU T., SR. PS ITA NO. 2271/AHD/2012 ACIT VS. SAKET IMPEX AY 2009-2010 3 / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT 2. / THE RESPONDENT. 3. ! # / CONCERNED CIT 4. # ( ) / THE CIT(A ) 5. & ! , ! , / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. / GUARD FILE . / BY ORDER, TRUE COPY / ( DY./ASSTT.REGISTRAR) # $, / ITAT, AHMEDABAD