IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH C , NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI J. SUDHAKAR REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 2 27 5 /DEL/20 12 AY: 200 6 - 07 GOURI HOSPITALS LTD. VS. ACIT, CIRCLE 37(1) 30, MALKA GANJ ROAD N BLOCK, VIKAS BHAVAN JAWAHAR NAGAR NEW DELHI NEW DELHI 110 007 PAN: AAACG 1618 F (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE. RESPONDENT BY : SH. AK SAROHA, CIT, D.R. ORDER PER J.SUDHAKAR REDDY, A.M. THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER DT. 07.03.2012 OF LD.CIT(A) - XXVIII, NEW DELHI FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 200 6 - 07 . 2. ON THE DATE OF HEARING I.E. ON 15.3.2016 , NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR ANY ADJOURNMENT APPLICATION WAS RECEIVED DESPITE ISSUAL OF NOTICE. HENCE IT IS PRESUMED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. HEARD SHRI T.VASANTHAN, LD.S R.D.R. ON BEHALF OF THE REVENUE. 3. FOLLOWING THE DECISIONS IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA P.LTD. 38 ITD, 320 (DELHI), AND THE DECISION OF THE HON BLE BOMBAY HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF M/S CHEMIPOL VS. UOI AND OTHERS IN CENTRAL EXC ISE APPEAL NO. 62/2009 JUDGEMENT DT. 17 TH SEPTEMBER,2009, WE CONSIDER IT A FIT CASE FOR ITA NO. 2275 /DEL/1 2 A.Y. 2006 - 07 GAURI HOSPITALS LTD., NEW DELHI 2 DISMISSING THE APPEAL IN LIMINE. IT IS TO CLARIFY THAT SUBSEQUENTLY, IF THE ASSESSEE EXPLAINS THE REASONS FOR NON - APPEARANCE AND IF THE BENCH IS SO SATISFIED, THE MA TTER MAY BE RECALLED FOR THE PURPOSE OF ADJUDICATION OF THE APPEAL. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE STANDS DISMISSED FOR NON - PROSECUTION. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 1 7 T H MARCH, 2016 . S D / - S D / - ( H.S. SIDHU ) (J.SUDHAKAR REDDY) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED: THE 1 7 T H MARCH, 2016 * MANGA COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT; 2.RESPONDENT; 3.CIT; 4.CIT(A); 5.DR; 6.GUARD FILE BY ORDER ASST. REGISTRAR