SUMAN DAGA, JAIPUR V. ITO, WARD 3(4), JAIPUR

ITA 228/JPR/2020

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 108 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 3317 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 2 month(s) 29 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 11-06-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2014-2015
• Appeal Filed On: 12-03-2020
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: A S NEHRA CIT DHK
• Assessee Lawyers: WITHDRAWAL APPLICATION FILED
• Keywords: Set aside

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES A, JAIPUR JH LANHI XLKA ] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA -@ ITA NO. 228/JP/2020 FU/KZKJ.K O'KZ@ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2014-15 SMT. SUMAN DAGA, B-13D, SHIV MARG, BANI PARK, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN-302005. CUKE VS. I.T.O., WARD 3(4), JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA -@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO.: ABXPD 6047 N VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS @ ASSESSEE BY: WITHDRAWAL APPLICATION FILED JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY: SHRI A.S. NEHRA (ADDL.CIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF HEARING : 11/06/2021 MN?KKS 'K.KK DH RKJH[K @ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 11/06/2021 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A)-1, JAIPUR DATED 16/01/2020 FOR THE A.Y. 2014-15. 2. THE HEARING OF THE APPEAL WAS CONCLUDED THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE IN VIEW OF THE PREVAILING SITUATION OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC. 3. THE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED AN APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE PRESENT APPEAL. THE CONTENTION MADE IN THE SAID APPLICATION READS AS UNDER: WITH REFERENCE TO ABOVE SUBJECT, WE THEREBY REQUEST YOU TO KINDLY ALLOW US TO RETRACT THE APPEAL FILED BY US AS THE ASSESSEE IS WILLING TO SET ASIDE THE CASE BY ENROLLING IN THE VIVAD SE VISWAS SCHEME AND HAS ALREADY DEPOSITED A SUM OF RS. 3,00,000/- AGAINST THE ITA 228/JP/2020_ SMT. SUMAN DAGA VS ITO 2 SAME. HENCE, WE MAKE A KIND REQUEST BEFORE YOUR HONOUR TO CONSIDER THE SAME. IT IS REQUESTED FROM YOU TO KINDLY DO THE NEEDFUL AND OBLIGE. THANKING YOU YOURS FAITHFULLY SD/- FOR DEVENDRA PAREEK & CO. CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS 4. THE LD DR HAS RAISED NO OBJECTION IF THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN. 5. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS ALREADY APPROACHED THE DEPARTMENT TO SETTLE THE MATTER UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, WE PERMIT THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW ITS APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 6. IN THE RESULT, THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 11 TH JUNE, 2021. SD/- SD/- FOE FLAG ;KNO LANHI XLKA (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (SANDEEP GOSAIN) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 11/06/2021 *RANJAN VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR @ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ @ THE APPELLANT- SMT. SUMAN DAGA, JAIPUR. 2. IZR;FKHZ @ THE RESPONDENT- THE I.T.O., WARD 3(4), JAIPUR. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR @ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDRVIHY @ THE CIT(A) ITA 228/JP/2020_ SMT. SUMAN DAGA VS ITO 3 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ @ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. XKMZ QKBZY @ GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 228/JP/2020) VKNS'KKUQLKJ @ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ @ ASST. REGISTRAR