Appeal details
Counselvise Citation
[2023] 101 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 9713 (ITAT-KOLKATA)
Assessee PAN
Bench
Appeal Number
Duration Of Justice
8 month(s) 10 day(s)
Appellant
Respondent
Appeal Type
Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date
29-11-2023
Appeal Filed By
Assessee
Order Result
Allowed
Bench Allotted
C
Next Hearing Date
28-11-2023
Assessment Year
2017-2018
Appeal Filed On
19-03-2023
Judgement Text
ITA Nos. 228 & 229/KOL/2023 Assessment years: 2016-2017 & 2017-2018 Vesuvius India Limited 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘C’ BENCH, KOLKATA Before Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-President (KZ) & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member I.T.A. Nos. 228 & 229/KOL/2023 Assessment Years: 2016-2017 & 2017-2018 Vesuvius India Limited,............................Appellant P-104, Taratolla Road, Kolkata-700088 [PAN: AAACV8995Q] -Vs.- Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (OSD),..Respondent Circle-11(1), Kolkata, Aayakar Bhawan, P-7, Chowringhee Square, Kolkata-700069 Appearances by: Shri Prashant Jaiswal, ACA, appeared on behalf of the assessee Shri Arup Chatterjee, Addl. CIT, appeared on behalf of the Revenue Date of concluding the hearing: November 29, 2023 Date of pronouncing the order: November 30, 2023 O R D E R Per Rajpal Yadav, Vice-President (KZ):- The present two appeals are directed at the instance of assessee against the separate orders of ld. Commissioner of ITA Nos. 228 & 229/KOL/2023 Assessment years: 2016-2017 & 2017-2018 Vesuvius India Limited 2 Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi dated 20.01.2023 and 23.01.2023 passed for A.Y. 2016-17 and 2017-18. 2. The only issue involved in both the years are that the ld. CIT(Appeals) has erred in confirming the disallowance of Rs.9,05,214/- and Rs.21,11,225/- out of Club Expenses debited by the assessee. 3. With the assistance of ld. Representatives, we have gone through the record carefully. The assessee has filed its return of income electronically declaring income of Rs.1,20,94,47,770/- and Rs.1,51,39,45,300/- in A.Y. 2016-17 and 2017-18 respectively. The assessee has debited club expenses in both the years. These expenditures have been disallowed to the assessee. The ld. Counsel for the assessee at the outset submitted that the issue regarding disallowance of club expenses was raised in earlier years and travelled upto the Hon’ble High Court in its own case. It has been always allowed to the assessee. He placed on record copy of the Hon’ble High Court’s decision in A.Y. 2001-02 as well as copy of the ITAT orders in A.Y. 2001-02, 2006-07, 2008-09 respectively. He thereafter made reference to a large numbers of papers and contended that these are Corporate Membership. The Company is a juridical person and there is no element of personal nature in such expenditure. Therefore, these expenses ought to have not been disallowed. ITA Nos. 228 & 229/KOL/2023 Assessment years: 2016-2017 & 2017-2018 Vesuvius India Limited 3 4. On the other hand, ld. D.R. contended that apart from subscriptions, there were expenditures debited on services, namely food and braveries. Such expenditures are not being allowable to the assessee. 5. We have duly considered the rival contentions and gone through the record carefully. We find that in a most of decisions, all Hon’ble High Courts are unanimous on their approach that Corporate Membership expenses are pure business expenditure and allowable under section 37 of the Income Tax Act. A reference to the following decision, apart from the decision rendered in the case of assessee itself in earlier year can be made:- CIT -vs- United Glass Mfg. Co. Ltd. [20121 28 taxmann.com 429 (SC) [Club membership fees is a pure business expenditure, allowable u/s 37] Pricewaterhouse Coopers Pvt. Ltd. -vs.- ACIT (ITA No. 2034/Kol/2013 dated 18-05-2016) (Kol-Trib) [Following the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in CIT -vs- United Glass Mfg. Co. Ltd. (supra), the jurisdictional ITAT has allowed subscription and entrance fees paid to various clubs as business expenditure] M/s MKT Tradex Ltd vs DCIT (ITA No.l044/Kol/2016 dated 14-02- 2018) [The purpose of incurring club expenditure is to have a suitable platform for meeting people and getting advantages of meeting many people at a time to maintain old contacts and also to make new contacts. The said expenses are incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business and hence, revenue in nature] Similar view has been taken in the following judgments: Associated Engg. Products -vs.- ITO (1997) 63 ITD 105 ITA Nos. 228 & 229/KOL/2023 Assessment years: 2016-2017 & 2017-2018 Vesuvius India Limited 4 Eveready Industries India Ltd. -vs.- DCIT (2001) 78 ITD 175 (Kol) ACIT -vs.- Britannia Industries Ltd. (Kol - Trib) (ITA No. 1789/Kol/2008) Date of order: 31-08-2010 ITO -vs.- Marcopolo Products Private Limited (2016) 159 ITD 266 (Kol - Trib); Star Paper Mills Limited vs DCIT (I.T.A. No.l27/Kol/2021) Date of order: 26-10-2021; Otis Elevator Co. (India) Ltd. -vs- CIT (1992) 195 ITR 682 (Bom); Gujarat State Export Corporation Ltd. -vs- CIT (1994) 209 ITR 649 (Gujarat); CIT -vs.- Sundaram Industries Ltd. (1999) 240 ITR 335 (Mad). 6. As far as the expenditure incurred on services are concerned, whether they can be termed as expenditure in personal nature or not. It is to be appreciated that a Company is a juridical person and there is no element of personal nature in such a character of a taxable entity. Hence nothing can be disallowed out of Club Expenses. We allow both the appeals and delete the disallowances. 7. In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed. Order pronounced in the open Court on 30/11/2023. Sd/- Sd/- (Rajesh Kumar) (Rajpal Yadav) Accountant Member Vice-President (KZ) Kolkata, the 30 th day of November, 2023 ITA Nos. 228 & 229/KOL/2023 Assessment years: 2016-2017 & 2017-2018 Vesuvius India Limited 5 Copies to :(1) Vesuvius India Limited, P-104, Taratolla Road, Kolkata-700088 (2) Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (OSD), Circle-11(1), Kolkata, Aayakar Bhawan, P-7, Chowringhee Square, Kolkata-700069 (3) Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi; (4) Commissioner of Income Tax- , Kolkata; (5) The Departmental Representative (6) Guard File TRUE COPY By order Assistant Registrar, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata Benches, Kolkata Laha/Sr. P.S.
