Govind Promoters Private Limited, Kolkata V. ITO, Ward - 6(2), Kolkata, Kolkata

ITA 230/KOL/2010

• Counselvise Citation: [2011] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 54618 (ITAT-KOLKATA)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 8 month(s) 15 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 19-10-2011
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Bench Allotted: A
• Next Hearing Date: 16-06-2011
• Assessment Year: 2004-2005
• Appeal Filed On: 04-02-2010
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: A K PRAMANIK

Judgement Text

, , , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A BENCH : KOLKATA [ () )) ) , , . .. . ! ! ! !. .. . , , , , '# ] ]] ] [BEFORE HONBLE SRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JM & HONBLE S RI C. D. RAO, AM] % / I.T.A NO. 230/KOL/2010 &' ()/ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2004-05 M/S.GOVIND PROMOTERS (P).LTD -VS.- I.T.O., WARD-6(2), KOLKATA [PAN : AAACG 9689 C] KOLKATA [ +, /APPELLANT ] [ -.+,/ RESPONDENT ] +, / FOR THE APPELLANT : NONE (VIDE ADJOURNMENT PETITION DT.19.10.2011) -.+, / FOR THE RESPONDENT : SHRI A.K.PRAMANIK /&0 1 !# /DATE OF HEARING : 19.10.2011. 2( 1 !# /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 19.10.2011. '3 /ORDER . .. . ! ! ! !. .. . , , , , '# PER C. D. RAO, A. M. THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED THIS APPEAL AGAINST THE ORD ER OF LD. CIT(A)-CENTRAL-VI, KOLKATA DATED 05.11.2009 PERTAINING TO ASSESSMENT Y EAR 2004-05. 2. THIS APPEAL CAME FOR HEARING ON 04.05.2010 FOR T HE FIRST TIME AND SUBSEQUENTLY ON 4.10.2010, 23.12.2010, 28.03.2011 AND 16.06.2011 AND FINALLY FIXED FOR HEARING ON 19.10.2011. NO ONE WAS PRESENT ON BEHALF OF THE ASS ESSEE. 2 2.1. THE ASSESSEES COUNSEL SHRI K.K.JAIN HAS PREF ERRED AN ADJOURNMENT PETITION DATED 19 TH OCTOBER, 2011 BY STATING THAT SHRI P.K.JAIN IS OUT OF STATION FOR SOME IMPORTANT AUDIT ASSIGNMENT. PHOTOCOPY OF POWER OF A TTORNEY IN FAVOUR OF SHRI P.K.JAIN IS ENCLOSED. WE REJECT THE ADJOURNMENT PETITION BY OBSERVING THAT COPY OF POWER OF ATTORNEY PRODUCED BY THE LD. COUNSEL FOR ASSESSEE I S DATED 12 TH SEPTEMBER, 1996 AND IT HAS NOT MENTIONED THE ASSESSMENT YEAR FOR WHICH ASS ESSEES COUNSEL IS AUTHORIZED TO APPEAR BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE WE ARE OF THE VIEW THAT ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED TO PROSECUTE THE APPEAL. 3. CONSIDERING THE FACTS AND KEEPING IN MIND THE DE CISION IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA PVT. LTD., 38 ITD 320, WE DISMISS THE APPEAL AS ASSESSEE NOT INTERESTED. 4. HOWEVER, THE ASSESSEE SHALL BE AT LIBERTY TO APP ROACH THE TRIBUNAL FOR RECALLING THIS ORDER, IF PREVENTED BY SUFFICIENT CAUSE FOR NO N-APPEARANCE ON THE DATE OF HEARING. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION. '3 #/' 4 /& 5 6 !# ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 19.10. 2011. SD/- SD/- [ , ] [ . .. . ! ! ! !. .. . , , , , '# ] [ MAHAVIR SINGH ] [ C. D. RAO ] JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (!#) DATED : 19.10. 2011. [RG &78 9 /.PS] 3 '3 1 -: ;':(/ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. GOVIND PROMOTERS PVT. LTD., CONTINENTAL CHAMBERS, 4 TH FLOOR, 15A, HEMANTA BASU SARANI, KOLKATA-700001. 2 I.T.O., WARD-6(2), KOLKATA 3. THE CIT, 4. THE CIT(A)-VI, KOLKATA. 5. DR, KOLKATA BENCHES, KOLKATA [.: -/ TRUE COPY] '3&// BY ORDER, 8 /ASSTT REGISTRAR