ACIT, CIRCLE- 20(2), NEW DELHI V. RDS MANAGEMENT SERVICES PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 2328/DEL/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 125 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 0802 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 5 month(s) 15 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 20-09-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Department
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2014-2015
• Appeal Filed On: 04-04-2018
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: L S KOHLI
• Assessee Lawyers: SURENDER PAL
• Keywords: Retrospective amendment; Tax effect

Judgement Text

1 ITA NO. 2328/DEL/2018 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: D+ SMC NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI N. K. SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEM BER AND MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDI CIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 2328/DEL/2018 ( A.Y 2014-15) ACIT CIRCLE-20(2) ROOM NO. 219, 2 ND FLOOR, C. R. BUILDING, NEW DELHI (APPELLANT) VS RDS MANAGEMENT SERVICES PVT. LTD. 201-205, 2 ND FLOOR, PRATAP BHAWAN, BAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MARG, NEW DELHI AADCR2013A (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY SH. L. S. KOHLI, AR RESPONDENT BY SH. SURENDER PAL SR. DR ORDER PER SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JM THIS APPEAL IS FILED BY THE REVENUE IS PREFERRED AG AINST THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX [APPEALS]-7, NEW DELHI, DATED 05.01.2018 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-15. 2. IT WAS SEEN THAT TAX EFFECT OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE IS BELOW RS.20,00,000/-. THEREFORE, THE LD. DR WAS ASKED AS TO WHY THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED DUE TO LOW TAX EFFECT IN THE LIGHT OF THE RECENT CBDT CIRCULAR NO.03/2018 DATED 11 TH JULY,2018. 3. WE HAVE HEARD THE PARTIES. IT IS FOUND THAT PURS UANT TO THE MANDATE OF SECTION 268A, THE CBDT HAS ISSUED CIRCULAR NO. 0 3 OF 2018, DATED 11TH JULY, 2018 WITH RETROSPECTIVE EFFECT, REVISING THE MONETARY LIMIT TO DATE OF HEARING 20.09.2018 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 20.09.2018 2 ITA NO. 2328/DEL/2018 RS.20,00,000/- FOR NOT FILING APPEALS BEFORE THE TR IBUNAL. IT IS FURTHER FOUND THAT AS THE TAX EFFECT INVOLVED IN THE INSTANT APPE AL IS LESS THAN RS.20,00,000/-, THE EXTANT APPEAL IS NOT MAINTAINAB LE. THE LD. DR, ALTHOUGH SUPPORTED THE ORDERS OF THE ASSESSING OFFI CER, BUT COULD NOT CONTROVERT THE FACT THAT TAX EFFECT INVOLVED IN THIS APPEAL IS LESS THAN RS.20,00,000/-. 4. GOING BY THE PRESCRIPTION OF THE ABOVE STATED CI RCULAR, IT IS OBSERVED THAT THE INSTRUCTION IS APPLICABLE TO THE PENDING APPEALS ALSO WITH RETROSPECTIVE EFFECT AND THERE IS A CLEAR-CUT DIREC TION TO THE DEPARTMENT TO WITHDRAW OR NOT PRESS SUCH APPEALS FILED BEFORE THE ITAT, WHEREIN TAX EFFECT IS LESS THAN RS.20,00,000/-. WE ARE, THEREFORE, OF THE VIEW THAT THE REVENUE SHOULD HAVE EITHER NOT FILED THE INSTANT APPEAL BEF ORE THE TRIBUNAL OR WITHDRAWN THE SAME AS THE TAX EFFECT IN THIS APPEAL IS ADMITTEDLY LESS THAN THE PRESCRIBED LIMIT, I.E., RS. 20,00,000/- FOR NOT FIL ING THE APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, WE DISMISSED THE INSTANT APPEAL WITHOUT GOING INTO MER ITS OF THE CASES. 5. THE LD. DR HAS BROUGHT TO OUR NOTICE A LETTE R DATED 20.08.2018 OF THE DIRECTOR (ITJ), CBDT, NEW DELHI ADDRESSED TO ALL TH E PRINCIPAL CCITS IN WHICH PARA NO. 10 OF THE EARLIER CIRCULAR DATED 11.7.2018 , ENUMERATING CERTAIN INSTANCES IN WHICH THE APPEALS SHOULD BE CONTESTED NOTWITHSTANDING THE LOW TAX EFFECT, HAS BEEN REVISED. HE, HOWEVER, COULD N OT PLACE ANY MATERIAL ON RECORD TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE ABOVE APPEAL IS COVE RED BY THE AMENDED PARA OF THE CIRCULAR. UNDER THESE CIRCUMSTANCES, WE DISMISS ED THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE AND GIVE LIBERTY TO THE DEPARTMENT TO FILE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, IF IT IS FOUND THAT EITHER THE TAX EFFECT IS MORE T HAN THE PRESCRIBED LIMIT OF RS.20,00,000/- OR THE APPEAL GETS COVERED IN THE RE VISED PARA 10 OF THE LETTER DATED 20.08.2018. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL OF THE R EVENUE STAND DISMISSED. 3 ITA NO. 2328/DEL/2018 6. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE STANDS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 20 TH SEPTEMBER, 2018 SD/- SD/- DATED: 20 TH SEPTEMBER, 2018. *R.N COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR, ITAT AR, ITAT, NEW DELHI. DATE OF DICTATION 20 .09.2018 DATE ON WHICH THE TYPED DRAFT IS PLACED BEFORE THE DICTATING MEMBER 20.09.2018 DATE ON WHICH THE TYPED DRAFT IS PLACED BEFORE THE OTHER MEMBER DATE ON WHICH THE APPROVED DRAFT COMES TO THE SR. PS/PS DATE ON WHICH THE FAIR ORDER IS PLACED BEFORE THE DICTATING MEMBER FOR PRONOUNCEMENT DATE ON WHICH THE FAIR ORDER COMES BACK TO THE SR. PS/PS 2 0 .09.2018 DATE ON WHICH THE FINAL ORDER IS UPLOADED ON THE WEBSITE OF ITAT 2 0 .09.2018 DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE BENCH CLERK 2 0 .09.2018 DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE HEAD CLERK THE DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR FOR SIGNATURE ON THE ORDER DATE OF DISPATCH OF THE ORDER (N.K.SAINI) (SUCHITRA KAMBLE) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER 4 ITA NO. 2328/DEL/2018