Sh. Sanjeev Kumar Sharma, Ghaziabad V. ITO, Ghaziabad

ITA 233/DEL/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2016] 131 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 7184 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 7 month(s) 20 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 07-09-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC 3
• Next Hearing Date: 07-09-2016
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 18-01-2016
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Assessee Lawyers: RAJIV AHUJA
• Section: 263

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH SMC - 3 , NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. N. K. SAINI, A CCOUNTANT M EMBER ITA NO. 233/DEL/2016 : ASSTT. YEAR : 2009 - 10 SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA, 15/103, SECTOR - 15, DUPLEX VASUN DHARA, GHAZIABAD - 201010 VS INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(3), GHAZIABAD (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN NO. A OPPS8054R ASSESSEE BY : SH. RAJIV AHUJA, CA REVENUE BY : SH. NEERAJ KUMAR , SR. DR DATE OF HEARING : 07.09 .201 6 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 07.09 .201 6 ORDER THIS IS AN APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 21.10.2015 OF LD. CIT(A) , GHAZIABAD . 2 . AT THE TIME OF HEARING LD. COUNSEL OF THE ASSESSEE FILED AN APPLICATION STATING T HEREIN AS UNDER: DEAR SIR, WE, ON BEHALF OF AND UNDER INSTRUCTIONS FROM OUR CLIENT SHRI SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA (HEREIN AFTER REFERRED TO AS 'APPELLANT') WITH REFERENCE TO CAPTIONED APPEAL FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009 - 10, SUBMITS AS UNDER: - THAT AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED U/S 143(3)/147 DATED 27.02.2014, A REVISION ORDER U/S 263 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 WAS PASSED DIRECTING THE ASSESSING OFFICER TO MAKE A FRESH ASSESSMENT. COPY OF THE ORDER IS ENCLOSED HEREWITH FOR YOUR KIND PERUSAL . ITA NO . 233 /DEL /201 6 SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA 2 IN THE ABOVE CIRCUMSTAN CES, THE APPELLANT IS NOT PRESSING THIS APPEAL WITH A RIGHT TO REPRESENT THE MATTER A FRESH IF REQUIRED BASED UPON THE FRESH ASSESSMENT ORDER. THE HON'BLE BENCH IS REQUESTED TO KINDLY PASS AN APPROPRIATE ORDER. SHOULD YOUR HONOUR REQUIRE ANY FURTHER DETAI LS / CLARIFICATIONS, WE SHALL BE PLEASED TO SUBMIT THE SAME. YOURS FAITHFULLY, SD/ - ( RAJEEV AHUJA ) CA 3 . IN HIS RIVAL SUBMISSIONS THE LD. DR DID NOT OBJECT IF THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 4 . IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, THE REQUEST OF THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE IS ACCEPTED. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE STANDS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 5 . IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED . (O RD ER PRO NO UNCED IN THE COURT ON 07 /0 9 /2016 ) SD/ - (N. K. SAINI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DAT ED: 07 /0 9 /2016 *SUBODH* COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(APPEALS) 5. DR: ITAT