IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH C: NEW DELHI (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT AND MS. MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO.233/DEL/2020 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2013-14 MEHAK INFRACON P. LTD., 302, DHAKA CHAMBER, 2068/39, NAIWALA, KAROL BAGH, NEW DELHI PAN-AAFCM9307E VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-16(3), NEW DELHI (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : MS. ANIMA BARANWAL, SR. DR DATE OF HEARING : 29.06.2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 29.06.2021 ORDER PER G.S. PANNU, VP : THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-14 IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF LEARNED CIT(A), DELHI-6 DATED 28.11.2019. . 2. NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE AT THE TIME OF VIRTUAL HEARING BEFORE US. THE ASSESSEE, VIDE LETTER DATED 26.04.2021, RECEIVED THROUGH EMAIL HAS REQUESTED FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL FILED BY HIM AND STATED THAT THE ITA-233/DEL/2020 2 ASSESSEE HAS OPTED TO SETTLE THE DISPUTE RELATING TO THE TAX ARREARS FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR UNDER CONSIDERATION UNDER THE VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, 2020. A CERTIFICATE TO THIS EFFECT UNDER SECTION 5(1) OF THE DIRECT TAX VIVAD SE VISHWAS ACT, 2020 HAS ALSO BEEN FILED. 3. LEARNED SENIOR DR HAS NO OBJECTION. 4. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, WE ACCEPT THE REQUEST OF THE ASSESSEE. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ABOVE DECISION WAS PRONOUNCED ON CONCLUSION OF VIRTUAL HEARING ON 29.06.2021. SD/- SD/- (MADHUMITA ROY) (G.S. PANNU) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT SH COPY FORWARDED TO: - 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR