IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH A, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO.2333/M/2014 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2006-07 SHRI AJIT CHOKSI, CHOKS COMPOUND, SAKI VIHAR RD. POWAI, MUMBAI 400 072 PAN: AAAPC8346B VS. DCIT, RANGE -8(1), INCOME TAX OFFICE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, MUMBAI (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PRESENT FOR: ASSESSEE BY : SHRI N.K. SHARMA, A.R. REVENUE BY : SHRI BRAJENDRA KUMAR, D.R. DATE OF HEARING : 24.12.2020 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 24.12.2020 O R D E R PER RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: THE PRESENT APPEAL HAS BEEN PREFERRED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 31.03.2013 OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) [HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE CIT(A)] RELEVANT TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07. 2. AT THE OUTSET, THE LD. COUNSEL OF THE ASSESSEE SUBMITTED THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS GONE INTO FOR VIVAD SE VISHVAS SCHEME UNDER THE DIRECT TAX VIVAD SE VISWAS SCHEME 2020, THEREFORE, THE CASE MAY KINDLY BE ADJOURNED. 3. SINCE THE ASSESSEE HAS GONE INTO FOR VIVAD SE VISWAS SCHEME 2020, THE ADJOURNMENT APPLICATION BY THE ASSESSEE IS REJECTED. BESIDES, WE ARE INCLINED TO DISMISS THE APPEAL OF THE ITA NO.2333/M/2014 SHRI AJIT CHOKSI 2 ASSESSEE IN VIEW OF THE DECISION OF THE HONBLE MADRAS HIGH COURT NANNUSAMY MOHAN (HUF) VS. ACIT TCA NO.372 OF 2020 WITH THE LIBERTY TO ASSESSEE TO GET THIS APPEAL RECALLED IN CASE ASSESSEE DOES NOT SUCCEED IN VSVS 2020. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 24.12.2020. SD/- SD/- ( AMARJIT SINGH) (RAJESH KUMAR) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI, DATED: 24.12.2020. * KISHORE, SR. P.S. COPY TO: THE APPELLANT THE RESPONDENT THE CIT, CONCERNED, MUMBAI THE CIT (A) CONCERNED, MUMBAI THE DR CONCERNED BENCH //TRUE COPY// [ BY ORDER DY/ASSTT. REGISTRAR, ITAT, MUMBAI.