, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A BENCH, AHMEDABAD . . , , BEFORE SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER ./ I.T.A. NO.2335 /AHD/2013 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2002-03) M/S. ALFA SYNTHETICS (ATLAS SYNTHETICS) A/10, MINI SILK HOUSE, ZAMPA BAZAR, SURAT. / VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICE WARD-5(1),SURAT. ./ ./ PAN/GIR NO. : AAEFA 3407 F ( / APPELLANT ) .. ( / RESPONDENT ) / APPELLANT BY : -NONE- / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI SANTOSH KARNANI, SR.DR / DATE OF HEARING 26/12/2016 / DATE OF PRONOUN CEMENT 27/12/2016 / O R D E R PER SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER : THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)-I, SURAT, DATED 05/09/2013 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR (AY) 2009-10. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SENT THROUGH RPAD POST, BUT THE SAME WAS RETURNED BY THE POSTAL AUTHORITIES WITH THE REMARK INCOMPLETE ADDRESS, WHICH IS PLACED ON RECORD. THE ASSESSEE HAS NOT INTIMATED REGISTRY ABOUT CHANGE OF ITA NO.2335/ AHD/2013 M/S ALFA SYNTHETICS. VS.ITO ASST.YEAR 2009-10 - 2 - ADDRESS, IF ANY. THE ASSESSEE HAS ALSO NOT FILED ANY APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT OF THE CASE. THEREFORE, IT IS PRESUMED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING WITH ITS APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL, THEREFORE, FOLLOWING ORDER OF THE ITAT, DELHI BENCH IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA PVT. LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DELHI), WE DISMISS THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. THIS ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 27/12/2016 SD/- SD/- ( PRAMOD KUMAR ) ( MAHAVIR PRASAD ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER AHMEDABAD; DATED 27/12/2016 / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT 2. / THE RESPONDENT. 3. / CONCERNED CIT 4. ( ) / THE CIT(A)-I, SURAT 5. , , / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. / GUARD FILE. / BY ORDER, //TRUE COPY// / ( DY./ASSTT.REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, AHMEDABAD TRUE COPY