Ceon Solutions Pvt.Ltd., Ahmedabad V. The Income tax Officer,Ward-1(3), Ahmedabad

ITA 2346/AHD/2011

• Counselvise Citation: [2015] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 89508 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 8 month(s) 23 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 08-06-2015
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: C
• Next Hearing Date: 08-06-2015
• Assessment Year: 2007-2008
• Appeal Filed On: 15-09-2011
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: MK SINGH
• Keywords: Reasonable cause

Judgement Text

, C IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL C BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI SHAILENDRA KUMAR YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ ITA NO.2346/AHD/2011 / ASSTT. YEAR: 2007-08 CEON SOLUTIONS P. LTD. 54, SAPTAK BUNGALOWS B/6. SHUKAN BUNGALOWS SCIENCE CITY ROAD, SOLA AHMEDABAD 380 060. PAN : AACCC 4345 D VS ITO, WARD-1(3) AHMEDABAD. ! / (APPELLANT) '# ! / (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE REVENUE BY : SHRI M.K. SINGH, SR.DR / DATE OF HEARING : 08/06/2015 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 08/06/2015 $%/ O R D E R PER N.S. SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: THIS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST ORDER OF THE CIT(A)-VI, AHMEDA BAD DATED 18.7.2011 FOR ASSTT.YEAR 2007-08. 2. NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SENT TO THE ASSESSEE BY RE GISTERED POST WITH ACKNOWLEDGEMENT DUE ON 27.4.2015, WHICH WAS RETURNE D UNSERVED BY THE POSTAL AUTHORITIES WITH THE REMARK LEFT ON 11 .5.2015 AND THE SAME IS PLACED ON RECORD. NO CHANGE OF ADDRESS HAS BEEN INFORMED BY THE ASSESSEE. THIS SHOWS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT SERIO US IN PURSUING WITH THIS APPEAL, AND THEREFORE, BY FOLLOWING THE DECISI ON OF THE HONBLE DELHI HIGH COURT IN CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA PVT. LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DELHI), WE DISMISS THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE . ITA NO.2346/AHD/2012 2 3. THE ASSESSEE MAY, IF SO ADVISED, FILE AN APPLICA TION BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL FOR RESTORATION OF ITS APPEAL AND HEARING ON MERITS BY SHOWING REASONABLE CAUSE FOR NOT APPEARING BEFORE THE TRIBU NAL ON THE DATE OF HEARING. THE BENCH, IF SO SATISFIED, MAY RECALL IT S ORDER AND RESTORE THE APPEAL TO ITS ORIGINAL NUMBER FOR HEARING ON MERITS . 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED IN LIMINE . ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON MONDAY, THE 8 TH JUNE, 2015 AT AHMEDABAD. SD/- SD/- ( RAJPAL YADAV ) JUDICIAL MEMBER ( N.S. SAINI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AHMEDABAD; DATED 08/6/2015