IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD SMC BENCH AHMEDABAD , BEFORE SHRI SHAILENDRA KUMAR YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER , ITA. NO.2358/AHD/2013 (ASSESSMENT YEAR:2011-12) NEESA LEISURE LTD. PLOT NO.X-22, 23 & 24, GIDC ELECTRONIC ESTATE, SECTOR-25, GANDHINAGAR-382044 APPELLANT VS. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL RANGE-2, AHMEDABAD RESPONDEN T PAN: AABCG7129C /BY APPELLANT :NONE /BY RESPONDENT :SHRI ADITYA SHUKLA, SR. D.R. ! '# /DATE OF HEARING : 14.07.2016 ! '# /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 19.07.2016 ORDER PER SHAILENDRA KUMAR YADAV, J.M: THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF JT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL RANGE-2, AHMEDABAD, DATED 27.08.2013 FOR A.Y. 2011-12. 2. AT THE OUTSET, IT IS SEEN FROM THE RECORDS THAT NOT ICE HAS BEEN ISSUED TO THE ASSESSEE ON 13.06.2016, HOWE VER, ITA NO.2358/AHD/13 A.Y. 11-12[NEESA LEISURE LTD. VS . JT. CIT] PAGE 2 ON THE DATE OF HEARING I.E. 14.07.2016 NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF ASSESSEE NOR FILED ANY ADJOURNMENT PETITI ON. THIS SHOWS THAT ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTIN G THIS APPEAL. 2.1 IN VIEW OF THESE FACTS, IT IS CLEAR THAT THE AS SESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THIS APPEAL, AND ACCORDIN GLY, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE MULTIPLAN (INDIA) (P) LTD., (38 ITD 320), I DISMISS THIS APPEAL FILED BY ASSESSEE FOR W ANT OF PROSECUTION. THE ASSESSEE SHALL HOWEVER BE AT LIBE RTY TO APPROACH THE TRIBUNAL FOR RECALLING OF THIS ORDER, IF PREVENTED BY SUFFICIENT CAUSE FOR NON-APPEARANCE ON THE DATE OF HEARING. 3. AS A RESULT, APPEAL FILED BY ASSESSEE IS DISMISS ED FOR NON PROSECUTION. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THIS THE 19 TH DAY OF JULY, 2016. SD/- (SHAILENDRA KUMAR YADAV) JUDICIAL MEMBER AHMEDABAD: DATED 19/07/2016 S.K.SINHA ! / COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO:- () * / REVENUE 2) / ASSESSEE -)./.01! 2! / CONCERNED CIT 4) 2!- / CIT (A) 5)67 8!019 '019: / / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD ;)8 <=> ? / GUARD FILE. BY ORDER / 9 /: .* '019: /