IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD C BENCH BEFORE: SHR I RAJPAL YADAV , JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER THE ACIT , CICLE - 2 (1)(2), AHMEDABAD (APPELLANT) VS M/S. MAHADEV PULSES PVT. LTD. 45/2 KABUTAR KHANA, OPP CHOKHA BAZAR, KALUPUR, AHMEDABAD PAN:AADCM6647B (RESPONDENT) REVENUE BY : S H RI LALIT P. JAIN , SR. D . R. ASSESSEE BY: SHRI S.N. DIVETIA , A.R. DATE OF HEARING : 27 - 09 - 2 018 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 27 - 09 - 2 018 / ORDER P ER : AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER : - T HIS REVENUE S APPEAL FOR A. Y. 2012 - 13 , ARI SES FROM ORDER OF THE CIT(A) - 2, AHMEDABAD DATED 27 - 05 - 2 015 , IN PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTION 143(3) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961; IN SHORT THE ACT . 2. THE GRIEVANCE OF THE REVENUE IS THAT THE LD. CIT(A) HAS ERRED IN DELETING DISALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTION U/S. 8 0IB(11A) OF RS.36,29,971 / - . 3. AT THE OUTSET, AFTER GOING THROUGH THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL AND THE IMPUGNED ORDERS OF THE REVENUE AUTHORITIES BELOW, A QUERY WAS RAISED BY THE BENCH AS TO APPLICABILITY AND MAINTAINAB ILITY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE IN VIEW OF RECENT CBDT CIRCULAR NO.3/2018 DATED 11.7.2018 RESTRICTING THE FILLING OF THE I T A NO . 2382 / A H D/20 15 A SS ESSMENT YEAR 2012 - 13 I.T.A NO. 2382 /AHD/20 15 A.Y. 2012 - 13 PAGE NO ACIT VS. M/S. MAHADEV PULSES PVT. LTD. 2 APPEAL BY THE REVENUE WHERE THE TAX EFFECT IS BELOW RS.20 LAKHS, THE LD. DR DID NOT DISPUTE THE SAME AND SUBMITTED THAT THE IS SUE IS LEFT TO THE TRIBUNAL TO BE DECIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. 4. WE FIND THAT THE APPEAL O F THE REVENUE IS PRESENTED ON 11.5.2015 . ON 11.7.2018 THE CBDT HAS ISSUED INSTRUCTIONS BEARING NO. 3 OF 2018 UNDER FILE NO.F.NO.279/MISC.142/2007 - ITJ(PT) PR OHIBITING ITS SUBORDINATE AUTHORITIES FROM FILING OF THE APPEAL TO THE TRIBUNAL AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A) WHERE THE TAX EFFECT BY VIRTUE OF THE RELIEF GIVEN BY THE CIT(A) IS LESS THAN RS.20 LAKHS. THE INSTRUCTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE APPLICABLE WITH RETR OSPECTIVE EFFECT, MEANING THEREBY, THESE INSTRUCTIONS ARE APPLICABLE ON PENDING APPEALS ALSO. IN THE PRESENT CASE, TAX EFFECT ON THE TOTAL INCOME ASSESSED MINUS THE TAX THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN CHARGEABLE HAD SUCH TOTAL INCOME BEEN REDUCED BY THE AMOUNT OF INCOME IN RESPECT OF THE ISSUE AGAINST WHICH APPEAL IS FILED, IS LESS THAN RS.20 LAKHS. FURTHER, THE CASE OF THE REVENUE DOES NOT FALL WITHIN THE AMBIT OF EXCEPTIONS PROVIDED IN THE CIRCULAR. THUS, KEEPING IN VIEW THE ABOVE CBDT CIRCULAR AND PROVISIONS OF SECTION 268A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, WE ARE OF THE VIEW THAT THE PRESENT APPEAL OF THE REVENUE DESERVES TO BE DISMISSED. IT IS ACCORDINGLY DISMISSED. HOWEVER, IT IS OBSERVED THAT IN CASE ON RE - VERIFICATION AT THE END OF THE AO IT COMES TO THE NOTICE THAT THE TAX EFFECT IS MORE OR REVENUE S CASE FALLS WITHIN THE AMBIT OF EXCEPTIONS PROVIDED IN THE CIRCULAR, THEN THE DEPARTMENT WILL BE AT LIBERTY TO APPROACH THE TRIBUNAL FOR RECALL OF THIS ORDER. SUCH APPLICATION SHOULD BE FILED WITHIN THE TIME PERIOD PRES CRIBED IN THE ACT. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISMISSED DUE TO LOW TAX EFFECT. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PR ONOUNCED IN THE OPEN C OURT O N 27 - 09 - 201 8 SD/ - SD/ - ( RAJPAL YADAV ) ( AMARJIT SINGH ) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A NO. 2382 /AHD/20 15 A.Y. 2012 - 13 PAGE NO ACIT VS. M/S. MAHADEV PULSES PVT. LTD. 3 AHMEDABAD : DATED 27 /09 /2018 / COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO: - 1. ASSESSEE 2. REVENUE 3. CONCERNED CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. GUARD FILE. BY ORDER/ , / ,