IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A BENCH : KOLKATA [BEFORE HONBLE SHRI S.S. GODARA, JM & SRI M.BALA GANESH, AM,] I.T.A NO. 2391/KOL/2016 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2011-1 2 M/S DYNAMETIC OVERSEAS (P) LTD. -VS.- ACIT, RANGE-8, KOLKATA (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S R. PIYARILALL INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD.) [PAN : AABCR 3157 P] (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) FOR THE APPELLANT : NONE FOR THE RESPONDENT : SHRI SALLONG YADEN, ADD L. CIT DATE OF HEARING : 02.05.2018 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 02.05.2018 ORDER PER M.BALAGANESH, AM 1. THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE ARISES OUT OF THE O RDER OF THE LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-18, KOLKATA [IN SHORT THE LD CITA] IN APPEAL NO.23.09.2016 PASSED AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ACIT, RANGE- 8, KOLKATA [IN SHORT THE LD. AO] UNDER SECTION 143(3) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 ( HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE ACT) DATED 30.03.2014 FOR THE ASST YEAR 2011-12. 2. THIS APPEAL WAS FIXED FOR HEARING FOR THE FIRST TIME ON 01.02.2018 ON WHICH DATE AN ADJOURNMENT WAS SOUGHT AND THE CASE WAS ACCORDIN GLY ADJOURNED TO 21.03.2018. AGAIN ON 21.03.2018 AN ADJOURNMENT WAS SOUGHT AND A CCORDINGLY THE CASE WAS ADJOURNED TO 02.05.2018 I.E. TODAY. WHEN THE CASE W AS CALLED UP FOR HEARING, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE AND NO ADJOURNME NT PETITION WAS PREFERRED BY THE 2 ITA NO.2391/KOL/2016 M/S DYNAMETIC OVERSEAS PVT. LTD. A.YR.2011-12 2 ASSESSEE. IT MEANS THAT ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED TO PROSECUTE THE APPEAL. HENCE THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS LIABLE TO BE DISMIS SED FOR NON PROSECUTION. FOR THIS VIEW WE FIND SUPPORT FROM THE FOLLOWING DECISIONS :- 1. IN THE CASE OF CIT VS B.N.BHATTACHARJEE AND ANO THER, REPORTED IN 118 ITR 461 [RELEVANT PAGES 477 & 478] WHEREIN THEIR LORDSHIPS HAVE HELD THAT : THE APPEAL DOES NOT MEAN MERELY FILING OF THE APPE AL BUT EFFECTIVELY PURSUING IT. 2. IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR V S CWT; 223 ITR 480 (MP) WHILE DISMISSING THE REFERENCE MADE AT THE INSTANCE OF TH E ASSESSEE IN DEFAULT MADE FOLLOWING OBSERVATION IN THEIR ORDER : IF THE PARTY, AT WHOSE INSTANCE THE REFERENCE IS M ADE, FAILS TO APPEAR AT THE HEARING, OR FAILS IN TAKING STEPS FOR PREPARATION OF THE PAPER BOOKS SO AS TO ENABLE HEARING OF THE REFERENCE, THE COURT IS NOT BOUND TO ANSWER THE REF ERENCE. 3. IN THE CASE OF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS MUL TIPLAN INDIA (P) LTD.: 38 ITD 320(DEL), THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE BEFORE TH E TRIBUNAL, WHICH WAS FIXED FOR HEARING. BUT ON THE DATE OF HEARING NOBODY REPRESEN TED THE REVENUE/APPELLANT NOR ANY COMMUNICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT WAS RECEIVED. THERE W AS NO COMMUNICATION OR INFORMATION AS TO WHY THE REVENUE CHOSE TO REMAIN A BSENT ON THAT DATE. THE TRIBUNAL ON THE BASIS OF INHERENT POWERS, TREATED THE APPEAL FI LED BY THE REVENUE AS UN ADMITTED IN VIEW OF THE PROVISIONS OF RULE 19 OF THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RULES, 1963. 3 . THE ASSESSEE, IF SO DESIRES, SHALL BE FREE TO MOVE THIS TRIBUNAL PRAYING FOR RECALLING THIS ORDER BY EXPLAINING WITH PROPER REASONS FOR NO N-COMPLIANCE, THEN THIS ORDER MAY BE RECALLED. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON 02.05.2018 SD/- SD/- [S.S.GODARA] [ M.BALAGANESH] JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED : 02.05.2018 SB, SR. PS 3 ITA NO.2391/KOL/2016 M/S DYNAMETIC OVERSEAS PVT. LTD. A.YR.2011-12 3 COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1.DYNAMETIC OVERSEAS PVT. LTD., (FORMERLY KNOWN AS R. PIYARILALL INTERNATIONAL (P) LTD.) , 99A, PARK STREET, SIDDHA PARK, KOLKATA-7000 16. 2. ACIT, CIRCLE-8, CHOWRINGHEE SQUARE, KOLKATA-7000 69 3.CIT(A)- 4. CIT- KOLK ATA 5. CIT(DR), KOLKATA BENCHES, KOLKATA. TRUE COPY BY ORDER SENIOR PRIVA TE SECRETARY HEAD OF OFFICE/ D.D.O., ITAT KOLKATA BENCHE S