ASSOCIATED ALUMINIUM INDUSTRIES P.LTD, MUMBAI V. CIT 6, MUMBAI

ITA 2413/MUM/2014

• Counselvise Citation: 241319914 RSA 2014
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 5 month(s) 25 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 05-10-2015
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 10-04-2014
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Assessee Lawyers: HARSH MATTA
• Section: 143(3); 263; 11

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH A, MUMBAI BEORE SHRI G.S.PANNU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI RAMLAL NEGI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 2413/MUM/2014 (ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2009-10) M/S. ASSOCIATED ALUMINIUM INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD., B-1, TULSI VIHAR, 1 ST FLOOR, DR.A.B.ROAD, WORLI NAKA, MUMBAI -18 PAN:AAACA 4473G ... APPELLANT VS. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -6, ROOM NO.507, AAYKAR BHAVAN, MK ROAD, MUMBAI 400020 .... RESPONDENT APPELLANT BY : MS. HARSH MATTA RESPONDENT BY : SHRI DURGA DUTT DATE OF HEARING : 05/10/2015 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 05/10/2015 ORDER PER G.S. PANNU,AM: THE CAPTIONED APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRE CTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CIT-6, MUMBAI DATED 28/02/2014 PERTAIN ING TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10 PASSED UNDER SECTION 263 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (IN SHORT THE ACT), WHICH IN TURN HAS A RISEN FROM AN ORDER PASSED BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER DATED 19/12/20 11 UNDER SECTION 143(3) OF THE ACT. 2. A LETTER DATED 5 TH OCTOBER, 2015 HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE, IN WHICH IT HAS BEEN STATED AS UNDER:- 2 ITA NO. 2413/MUM/2014 (ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2009-10) SUB: PERMISSION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL. RE: ASSOCIATED ALUMINIUM IND. P. LTD. ITA NO.2413/M /14 A.Y. 2009-2010 REF: HEARING ON 05.10.2015. WITH REFERENCE TO THE APPEAL FILED BY US, WE HAVE TO STATE THAT WE WISH TO WITHDRAW THE PRESENT APPEAL FILED BY US BEF ORE YOUR HONOURS. IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, WE REQUEST YOUR HONOURS TO K INDLY GIVE US PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE PRESENT APPEAL AND OBLIG E. 3. LD. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE DID NOT HAVE ANY OBJECTION TO SUCH REQUEST FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL. THEREFO RE, AFTER HEARING BOTH THE PARTIES, THE APPEAL WAS PERMITTED TO BE WI THDRAWN. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. THE ABOVE DECISION WAS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN CO URT IN THE PRESENCE OF BOTH THE PARTIES AT THE CONCLUSION OF T HE HEARING ON 05/10/2015. SD/- SD/- (RAMLAL NEGI) (G.S. PANNU) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT ME MBER MUMBAI, DATED 05/10/2015 COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. THE APPELLANT , 2. THE RESPONDENT. 3. THE CIT(A)- 4. CIT 5. DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. GUARD FILE. BY ORDER, //TRUE COPY// (DY./ASSTT. REGISTRAR) ITAT, MUMBAI VM , SR. PS