, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK BEFORE SHRI N.S.SAINI, AM & SHRI PAV AN KUMAR GADALE, JM ITA NO. 245 /CTK/201 4 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 20 09 - 20 1 0 ) KASINATH BEHERA, AT: SAHID NAGAR, J ODA, DIST: KEONJHAR (ODISHA) VS. CIT, CIRCLE - 1(1), SAMB A L PUR ./ ./ PAN/GIR NO. : A EQPB 5277 G ( / APPELLANT ) .. ( / RESPONDENT ) /AS SESSEE BY : NONE /REVENUE BY : SHRI D.K.PR ADHAN, CIT D R / DATE OF HEARING : 15 / 0 2 /201 8 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 28 / 0 2 /201 8 / O R D E R PER SHRI N.S.SAINI , A M : TH IS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CIT( A ), BERHAMPUR (CAMP: BHUBA NESWAR) , DATED 10.03.2014 . 2. NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE WHEN THE CASE WAS CALLED FOR HEARING, NEITHER ANY ADJOURNMENT PETITION WAS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. AT THE REQUEST OF LD.AR OF THE ASSESSEE EARLIER ADJOURNMENT S WERE GRANTED ON 27.07.2017 AND 09.11.2017. THEREAFTER NOTICE OF HEARING DATED 15.02.2018 SENT TO THE ASSESSEE ON 12.01.2018 HAS NOT BEEN RETURNED BACK BY THE POSTAL AUTHORITIES UNSERVED. THIS SHOWS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING THIS APPEAL. THEREFORE, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (P) LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DELHI) , APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 3 . IN THE RESULT, APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED I N THE OPEN COURT ON THIS 28 / 0 2 /201 8 . SD/ - ( PAVAN KUMAR GADALE ) SD/ - (N. S. SAINI) / JUDICIAL MEMBER / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER CUTTACK ; DATED 28 /0 2 /2018 . . / PKM , SENIOR PRIVATE SECRETARY ITA NO. 245 /1 4 2 / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : / BY ORDER, ( SENIOR PRIVATE SECRETARY ) , / IT AT, CUTTACK 1. / THE APPELLANT - KASIN ATH BEHERA, AT: SAHID NAGAR, JODA, DIST: KEONJHAR (ODISHA) 2. / THE RESPONDENT - CIT, CIRCLE - 1(1), SAMB A L PUR 3. ( ) / THE CIT(A), 4. / CIT 5. , , / DR, ITAT, CUTTACK 6. / GUARD FILE. //TRUE COPY//