Sh. Sanjeev Kumar, Delhi V. Pr. CIT, New Delhi

ITA 2472/DEL/2015

• Counselvise Citation: [2016] 132 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 8189 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 28-04-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: F
• Next Hearing Date: 28-04-2016
• Assessment Year: 2011-2012
• Appeal Filed On: 28-04-2015
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: MRS NANDITA KANCHAN
• Assessee Lawyers: B N GOSWAMY
• Section: 143(3); 263

Judgement Text

ITA NOS. 2471,2472/DEL/2015 ASSTT. YEAR: 2011-12 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH F NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNT ANT MEMBER ITA NO. 2471/DEL/2015 ASSESSMENT Y EAR: 2011-12 JAG ROSHANI VS. PR. CIT H. NO. 16, VILLAGE & DELHI 13, P.O BAKOLI, NEW DELHI ALIPUR DELHI 110 036 PAN AIDPR1768D (APPELLANT) (RESPON DENT) ITA NOS. 2472/DEL/2015 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2011-12 SANJEEV KUMAR VS. PR. CIT H. NO. 16, VILLAGE & DELHI 13, P.O BAKOLI, NEW DELHI ALIPUR DELHI 110 036 PAN APWPK5402P (APPELLANT) (RESPON DENT) APPELLANT BY: SHRI B.N. GOSWAMY, ADVOCATE RESPONDENT BY: MRS. N ANDITA KANCHAN, CIT (DR) O R D E R PER CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER CAPTIONED APPEALS HAVE BEEN FILED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE PR. CIT, NEW DELHI BOTH DATED 26.3.2015 FOR ASSTT. YEAR 2011-12. ITA NOS. 2471,2472/DEL/2015 ASSTT. YEAR: 2011-12 2 2. IN THESE APPEALS THE APPELLANTS HAVE CHALLENG ED THE ORDER OF THE PCIT PASSED U/S 263 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961 (FOR SHOR T THE ACT). HOWEVER IN THE BEGINNING OF THE ARGUMENTS THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANTS SUBMITTED THAT SINCE THE AO ON 29.3.2016 HAS PASSED ASSESSMENT ORD ER U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 263 OF THE ACT AND THE ASSESSES ARE SATISFIED WITH THE ASS ESSMENT ORDERS PASSED IN PURSUANT TO THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF PCIT THEREFORE AP PEALS DO NOT WANT TO FURTHER AGITATE THE ISSUE BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL AND THE APPE LLANTS MAY KINDLY BE ALLOWED TO WITHDRAW THESE APPEALS. LD. DR SUBMITTED THAT THE D EPARTMENT HAS NO OBJECTION IF THE APPELLANTS ARE ALLOWED TO WITHDRAW THEIR AP PEALS AND APPEALS MAY KINDLY BE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN FIRST. 3. IN VIEW OF ABOVE SUBMISSIONS OF BOTH THE SIDES APPELLANTS ARE ALLOWED TO WITHDRAW THEIR APPEALS AND BOTH THE APPEALS ARE DIS MISSED AS WITHDRAWN. THE ORDER WAS PRONOUNCED ON CONCLUSION OF THE HEARING ON 28 TH APRIL, 2016. SD/- SD/- (L.P. SAHU) (CHANDRA MOHAN GARG) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED 28 TH APRIL, 2016 *VEENA COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT(A) 4. CIT 5. DR BY ORDER ASSTT REGISTRAR, ITAT