, A IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL D BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ ITA.NO.2473/AHD/2014 / ASSTT. YEAR: 2011-2012 ITO, WARD - 4(2) AHMEDABAD. VS KALIKABUILDCON P.LTD. 53, NIRAN PARK OPP: SUN-N-STEP CLUB GHATLODIA, THALTEJ, AHMEDABAD 380 061. PAN : AACCK 3275 G ! / (APPELLANT) '# ! / (RESPONDENT) REVENUE BY : SHRI V.K. SINGH, SR.DR ASSESSEE BY : SHRI B.K. PATEL, AR / DATE OF HEARING : 12/07/2018 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 12 /07/2018 $%/ O R D E R PER RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER: THE REVENUE IS IN APPEAL AGAINST THE ORDER OF LD.CO MMISSIONER INCOME-TAX (APPEALS)-VIII, AHMEDABAD DATED 23.6.201 4 PASSED FOR THE ASSTT.YEAR 2011-12. 2. THE GRIEVANCE OF THE REVENUE IS THAT THE LD. CIT (A) HAS ERRED IN DELETING DISALLOWANCE OF UNDISCLOSED INCOME OF RS.6 0.00 LAKHS. 3. AT THE OUTSET, AFTER GOING THROUGH THE GROUNDS O F APPEAL AND THE IMPUGNED ORDERS OF THE REVENUE AUTHORITIES BELOW, A QUERY WAS RAISED ITA NO.2473/AHD/2014 2 BY THE BENCH AS TO APPLICABILITY AND MAINTAINABILIT Y OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE IN VIEW OF RECENT CBDT CIRCULAR NO.3 /2018 DATED 11.7.2018 RESTRICTING THE FILLING OF THE APPEAL BY THE REVENUE WHERE THE TAX EFFECT IS BELOW RS.20 LAKHS, THE LD.DR DID NOT DISPUTE THE SAME AND SUBMITTED THAT THE ISSUE IS LEFT TO THE TRIBUNAL TO BE DECIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. 4. WE FIND THAT THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS PRESEN TED ON 8.9.2014. ON 11.7.2018 THE CBDT HAS ISSUED INSTRUCTIONS BEARI NG NO. 3 OF 2018 UNDER FILE NO.F.NO.279/MISC.142/2007-ITJ(PT) PROHIB ITING ITS SUBORDINATE AUTHORITIES FROM FILING OF THE APPEAL T O THE TRIBUNAL AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A) WHERE THE TAX EFFECT BY VIR TUE OF THE RELIEF GIVEN BY THE CIT(A) IS LESS THAN RS.20 LAKHS. THE INSTRU CTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE APPLICABLE WITH RETROSPECTIVE EFFECT, MEANING THERE BY, THESE INSTRUCTIONS ARE APPLICABLE ON PENDING APPEALS ALSO. IN THE PRE SENT CASE, TAX EFFECT ON THE TOTAL INCOME ASSESSED MINUS THE TAX THAT WOU LD HAVE BEEN CHARGEABLE HAD SUCH TOTAL INCOME BEEN REDUCED BY TH E AMOUNT OF INCOME IN RESPECT OF THE ISSUE AGAINST WHICH APPEAL IS FIL ED, IS LESS THAN RS.20 LAKHS. FURTHER, THE CASE OF THE REVENUE DOES NOT FA LL WITHIN THE AMBIT OF EXCEPTIONS PROVIDED IN THE CIRCULAR. THUS, KEEPING IN VIEW THE ABOVE CBDT CIRCULAR AND PROVISIONS OF SECTION 268A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, WE ARE OF THE VIEW THAT THE PRESENT APPEAL OF THE R EVENUE DESERVES TO BE DISMISSED. IT IS ACCORDINGLY DISMISSED. HOWEVER, IT IS OBSERVED THAT IN CASE ON RE-VERIFICA TION AT THE END OF THE AO IT COMES TO THE NOTICE THAT THE TAX EFFECT I S MORE OR REVENUES CASE FALLS WITHIN THE AMBIT OF EXCEPTIONS PROVIDED IN THE CIRCULAR, THEN ITA NO.2473/AHD/2014 3 THE DEPARTMENT WILL BE AT LIBERTY TO APPROACH THE T RIBUNAL FOR RECALL OF THIS ORDER. SUCH APPLICATION SHOULD BE FILED WITHI N THE TIME PERIOD PRESCRIBED IN THE ACT. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, THE A PPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISMISSED DUE TO LOW TAX EFFECT. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISM ISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON 12 TH JULY, 2018 AT AHMEDABAD. SD/- SD/- (AMARJIT SINGH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (RAJPAL YADAV) JUDICIAL MEMBER