IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “B” DELHI BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.2480/DEL/2018 Assessment Year 2014-15 Swar Maya Infotech P. Ltd. B-203, Rose Wood Apartment Mayur Vihar Phase-1, Delhi Vs. ITO, Ward-22(4) New Delhi TAN/PAN: AAHCS6835P (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by: Shri Ved Jain, Adv. Ms. Supriya Mehta, CA Respondent by: Shri Vivek Kumar Upadhyay, Sr.DR Date of hearing: 25 07 2023 Date of pronouncement: 25 07 2023 O R D E R PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, A.M.: T he capt ione d a ppeal has bee n file d by t he assess ee a gainst the order of the ld. Commiss i oner of Income T ax (A ppeals ) -X XX , N ew D elhi ( ‘C IT (A )’ i n s hor t) da te d 28. 02. 2018 a rising fr om the assess me nt orde r dat ed 21. 12. 20 16 pass ed by th e Assessing O fficer (A O) unde r Sect ion 14 3(3) of t he Inc ome T ax A ct, 19 61 (t he Act ) co ncerning AY 2014-1 5. 2. T he grou nds of appea l ra ised b y the assesse e read as unde r: “ 1 . O n t h e f a c t s a n d c i r c u m s t a n c e s o f t h e c a s e , t h e o r d e r p a s s e d b y t h e l e a r n e d C o m m i s s i o n e r o f I n c o m e T a x ( A p p e a l s ) [ CI T ( A ) ] i s b a d b o t h i n t h e e y e o f l a w a n d o n f a c t s . 2 . O n t h e f a c t s a n d c i r c u m s t a n c e s o f t h e c a s e , l e a rn e d C I T ( A ) h a s e r r e d b o t h o n f a c t s a n d i n l a w i n e n h a n c i n g t h e i n co m e o f t h e a s s e s s e e I.T.A. No.2480/Del/2018 2 w i t h o u t f o l l o w i n g d u e p r o c e d u r e a s p r e s c r i b e d u n d e r t h e l a w . 3 . O n t h e f a c t s a n d c i r c u m s t a n c e s o f t h e c a s e , t h e l e a r n e d C I T ( A ) h a s e r r e d b o t h o n f a c t s a n d i n l a w i n h o l d i n g t h a t r e n ta l i n c o m e e a r n e d b y t h e a s s e s s e e t o b e a s s e s s e d a s ' i n c o m e u n d e r t h e h ea d b u s i n e s s & p r o f e s s i o n ' a s a g a i n s t ' i n c o m e u n d e r t h e h e a d h o u s e p r o p e r t y ' d e c l a r e d b y t h e a s s e s s e e . 4 . O n t h e f a c t s a n d c i r c u m s t a n c e s o f t h e c a s e , t h e l e a r n e d C I T ( A ) h a s e r r e d b o t h o n f a c t s a n d i n l a w i n m a k i n g e n h a n c e m e nt o f i n c o m e b y d i s a l l o w i n g a n a m o u n t o f R s . 5 8 , 1 5 , 2 2 0 / - c l a i m e d b y t h e a s s e s s e e u n d e r s e c t i o n 2 4 ( a ) o f t h e I n c o m e T a x A c t . 5 . O n t h e f a c t s a n d c i r c u m s t a n c e s o f t h e c a s e , t h e l e a r n e d C I T ( A ) h a s e r r e d b o t h o n f a c t s a n d i n l a w i n m a k i n g e n h a n c e m e nt o f i n c o m e b y d i s a l l o w i n g a n a m o u n t o f R s . 3 1 , 4 7 , 4 8 1 / - c l a i m e d b y t h e a s s e s s e e u n d e r s e c t i o n 2 4 ( b ) o f t h e I n c o m e T a x A c t t r e a t i n g t h e s a m e t o b e p r i o r p e r i o d e x p e n s e s . 6 . O n t h e f a c t s a n d c i r c u m s t a n c e s o f t h e c a s e , t h e l e a r n e d C I T ( A ) h a s e r r e d b o t h o n f a c t s a n d i n l a w i n n o t a l l o w i n g t h e s e t - o f f o f c u r r e n t y e a r b u s i n e s s l o s s o f R s . 4 1 , 1 9 , 0 6 1 / - i n c u r r e d b y th e a s s e s s e e w i t h i n c o m e f r o m h o u s e p r o p e r t y a s p e r s e c t i o n 7 1 o f t h e A c t . 7 . Wi t h o u t p r e j u d i c e t o t h e a b o v e a n d i n t h e a l t e r na t i v e , L d . C I T ( A ) h a s e r r e d b o t h o n f a c t s a n d i n l a w i n n o t a l l o w i n g a n a m o u n t o f R s . 1 , 3 3 , 4 6 , 4 9 7 / - s u o m o t t o d i s a l l o w e d b y t h e a s s e s se e w h i l e c o m p u t i n g i n c o m e u n d e r t h e h e a d b u s i n e s s a n d p r o f e ss i o n . ” 3. Br ie fl y s tated, the assess ee-compa ny is e ngage d i n the bus iness of fac il i ty ma nage ment s ervi ce and busi ne ss sup port ser vi ce. A dd it i ona ll y, t he ass essee- co mpan y has derived rental inco me by le asi ng of commercia l space. T he ass esse e-compan y fi led ret urn o f income f or A ssess ment Y ea r 2015-16 in ques ti on w her ei n t he ass e ssee decl ared re ntal income u nde r the hea d ‘i nc ome from h ous e pr ope rt y’ w he reas the in come de ri ved b y wa y of fac il i ty manag ement servi ces w ere decla re d unde r t he hea d ‘bus iness income’ an d s ubje cte d t o expenses and deduct ions as avail able unde r law . Resultantl y, th e assesse e has s how n inc ome fro m hous e p rope rt y at R s.7 1, 40, 06 2/- w he re as bus ine ss l oss o f Rs. 41, 19,061/- w as cla i me d for the Assess me nt Yea r 2015 -16 i n que st ion. T he A s sessing O ff ice r w hile fra mi ng the assess ment I.T.A. No.2480/Del/2018 3 order un der Se ct i on 143 (3) of the A ct i nt er al ia dis all ow ed the bus iness loss at R s .41, 19, 06 1/-. 4. A gg rieve d, t he as s essee prefe rred appeal b efo re the C IT (A ). A fter cons ide ring the s ubmiss ions ma de on b ehal f of the assess ee, the C IT (A ) co ncl uded t ha t the as sessee is carr yi ng on the act iv it ies of faci l it y ma nagemen t etc. in a s ys te matic m anne r yea r af te r yea r and the build in gs use d as business assets a re show n as bus iness assets of the assesse e- com pan y. The C IT (A ) conclude d that the renta l income decla red unde r the h ead ‘i ncome fro m hous e pro pert y’ als o s hould be assessed under t he head ‘business inco me. T he C IT (A ) t hus after gi ving s how c aus e notice e tc. re - charac te rized the ent i re income as bus in ess i nc ome and als o denied deducti on cla i med und er S ec ti on 24(a) as w ell as i nt er est re la ting to pri or period claimed under Sec t ion 2 4(b) of t he A ct. Certain deduc tio ns w ere a ll ow ed t ow ar ds re pair and main te na nce etc. In ess enc e, t he C IT (A ) re-char acterized the nat ure of income as well as de nied seve ra l expe nses cla imed as incu rre d f or the pur pos es of bus iness. T he r el evan t opera tive pa ra graph of the order o f the CI T(A ) is reproduced her eunde r: “ The a p p e ll a nt w a s gi v e n t h e r e q ui s i t e n o t ic e f or enh a nc e m e n t a s r e p r o d u c e d a b o v e . T he r e p l y of t he ap pe l l a nt h a s bee n d ul y c o ns i de r e d . I h a v e e x am i ne d t h e r e p l y a nd t h e f a c ts a t h an d . I t i s e s t a b li s he d th a t t h e m a i n a c t i v i t y o f t he a pp e l l an t i s e ar n i n g i n c om e f r o m g i v in g ou t p r o pe r ty on l e as e . T h e a pp e ll a n t i s c a r r y i n g t hi s a c t i v i t y i n a s y s t e m at i c m a n n e r , y e a r af t e r y e a r . T he a p pe l l a n t i s a l s o r e nd e r i ng f ac i l i t y m a n a g e m e nt s e rv i c e s , in c o nn e c t i on w i t h p r o pe r ti e s t h a t h av e be e n l e a s e d o ut. T he m a i n a c t i v it y o f t h e a p p e l l a nt an d t h e m a i n i nc o m e e ar ned b y t he a p pe l l a n t is f r o m l e as in g o ut p r op e r t i e s on r e nt . Th e a p pe l l an t , in h i s b al a nc e s h e e t , i s s h ow i n g t h e s e bu i l di n g s as bus i n e s s a s s e t s . T he i n c o m p l e t e bu i l di n gs h a v e be e n s ho w n a s W or k in P r o g r e s s . S i nc e t h e s u bs t a n ti v e a c t iv i t y o f t he a pp e l l an t c ompa ny i s gi v i ng o u t p r o pe r t y o n l e a s e ( a nd gi v i n g f ac i l i t y m a n a ge me n t s e r v i c e s c o nn e c t e d w i t h t h e b ui l d i n g s ) , I h o l d t h at t h e ap p el l a nt ' s i n c o m e I.T.A. No.2480/Del/2018 4 ( s o ug h t t o be s ho w n u n de r t he h e ad i n c om e f r o m h o use p r o p e r t y ) s ho ul d b e as s e s s e d i n c o m e u n de r t he H e ad I nc o m e f r om B u s i n e s s a n d P r o f e s s i o n. S i nc e t h e i nc o m e h i t h e r t o s h o w n u nd e r t h e h e a d I nc om e f r o m H ou s e P r op e r t y is h e l d by m e t o be I nc o m e f r o m B u s ine s s a n d P r of e s s i o n , th e d e d u c t io n c l ai m e d u / s . 24 (a ) am ou nti n g t o R s . 5 8 , 1 5 , 2 2 0 / - i s d i s a l l o w e d . T h e a pp e l l a n t w i l l b e all o w e d r e p ai r a nd m ai n t e n a nc e e x p e n s e s o n ly t o t he e x t e nt t h at h av e be e n ac t u al l y i n c ur r e d. Th e i n te r e s t r e l a t i ng t o p r i or p e r i od w i ll b e d i s a ll o w e d . H ow e v e r , t he a p pe l l an t w i ll b e f r e e t o t r e a t t he s am e a s p a r t of c a pi t a l v a l ue of a s s e t s . D e p r e c i at i o n w i l l be al l o wa b le o n l y t o t he e x t e n t al l o w a b l e u n d e r t h e I T. A c t . A c c o r d i ng l y , i nc om e o f t he a p pe l l a n t g e t s e nh an c e d t o t h e e x t e n t as de t a i le d abo v e . ” 5. A gg rieve d b y t he action of t he CIT (A ) resul ti ng in enhan ce me nt o f taxa bl e inco me, t he assessee prefe rred appe al be fore t he T ri bunal. 6. When the matter w as calle d fo r hearin g, the ld. couns el for the asses see a t the ou tse t s ubmi tted t he c omp ut at ion of inc ome as pe r ret urn o f i nco me fi le d fo r A ssess men t Y ear 2014-15 i n que st ion and als o furnished a lte rn ati ve computati ons f or tw o sit ua tio ns (i ) wh er e t he w hol e o f th e i nco me d er ived by w a y of re nt al income and fac il it y mana ge me nt i ncome a re trea ted as taxable und er the he ad ‘i nc ome f rom ho use pro pert y (ii ) where suc h re nt al i nco me is re-c ha racte ri zed as bus i ness i nc ome of the assessee. O n the basis of co mputa ti ons, th e l d. counsel submi t te d that it w il l no t ma ke any f unda me ntal di ffe rence to the Rev en ue if one of the courses is ado pted. T he l d. couns el in the sa me vei n submit ted th at t he C IT (A ) has c om mi tted fa ul t not onl y in re - charac te riz in g the income but also ar bit rari l y re fuse d t o a llow several expe nses clai med as pe r Profi t & L os s Account wit hout gi vi ng an y j us tifia ble reas ons for denial of cla ims aga i nst bu siness inco me as re-characte rized b y the C IT(A ) himsel f. The ld. counsel ther ea fter su bmi tted that the assessee i n th e past has bee n I.T.A. No.2480/Del/2018 5 decla ri ng th e re nt al i nc ome unde r t he he ad ‘income from house pro pert y’ w hereas faci lit y ma na ge me nt se rv ices i ncome w ere cla imed un der the hea d ‘bus iness or profess iona l i ncome’. T he l d. counse l thus s ubmit ted t ha t havi ng re ga rd to doct rine of consiste nc y, t he me th od of de te rminati on of t axable i nc ome shoul d not be dis turbed wi thou t show in g a n y compelli ng justi ficat ion for doing s o. The ld. co uns el thus s ubmitt ed tha t the ma tter ma y, at b es t, be re mi tte d bac k t o th e f ile of t he Assessing O fficer f or comp utat io n of t otal inc ome consiste nt w ith the me thod a dopted in the earli er years and in accord ance wi th law . 7. T he l d. D R for t he Revenue, on the ot he r hand, re lied up on the or de r of the CIT (A ). 8. We ha ve ca re ful ly conside re d t he rival su bmiss i ons. The cont rove rs y revolves around ta xa bil it y o f rental income and faci lit y ma na ge me nt se rvi ces i nc ome unde r the a ppropriate h ea d and al low abi lit y of deducti ons and expend it ure in accor dance wit h law . 9. A fte r per usal o f the ass ess ment o rde r and t he first a ppe lla te order a nd on app raisa l of the fi na ncial acco unts a nd als o the di ffe re nt me tho ds of co mpu ta tion demons t rated on behalf o f the assessee, w e are i ncl ined to a gree w ith the arguments can vasse d on behalf o f the assessee. H av ing reg ar d to t he cl ai m of the assessee t ha t i nco me offered in the pas t in t he simi la r ci rc ums ta nces has bee n apportioned under t he head ‘in come fro m house proper t y’ and ‘ bus iness i nc ome ’ an d t he ta xa bl e i nco me has been co mpute d a ft er c lai m of deduct ions s tatu tor il y av ail able a nd expens es i ncur red fo r t he purpose of busi nes s in accordance w it h law , there does not appea r t o b e any jus ti ficati on to depa rt I.T.A. No.2480/Del/2018 6 ther ef rom in the p resent c ase i n the Assess me nt Y ear 2014- 15 i n que st ion base d on su rmises and fl ee ting observa tions. We t hus set asi de the ac tion of the C IT (A ) and restore the ma tter to the fi le of the A ssess ing O ffi cer for rede te rmin ati on of taxable i ncome under the approp riate he ad an d a fter a llow ing the stat utory and ot he r deduc ti ons and cla im tow a rds ex pe ns es under t he respe cti ve hea ds of i nc ome i n accordance w ith law . 10. In the r esu lt, the appeal of t he a ssessee is all ow ed f or sta tis ti ca l purpos es . Order dictated and pronounced in the open Court on 25/07/2023 Sd/- Sd/- [CHANDRA MOHAN GARG] [PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA] JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED: /07/2023 Prabhat