Sh. Ram Avtar, New Delhi V. ACIT, New Delhi

ITA 2488/DEL/2015

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 125 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 7142 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 2 month(s) 7 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 05-07-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: F
• Assessment Year: 2008-2009
• Appeal Filed On: 28-04-2015
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: AFIQ AHMED

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES F : DELHI BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI O.P. KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA.NO.2488/DEL./2015 ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009 SHRI RAM AVTAR A-100, ASHOK NAGAR, SHAHDARA, NEW DELHI. PAN AEGPA3211H VS THE ACIT, CIRCLE-34(1), NEW DELHI (APPL IC ANT S ) (RESPONDENT) FOR ASSESSEE : -NONE- FOR REVENUE : SHRI AFIQ AHMED, SR. DR DATE OF HEARING : 05 .0 7 .2018 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 05 .0 7 .2018 ORDER PER BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M. THIS APPEAL BY ASSESSEE HAS BEEN DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A)-19, NEW DELHI, DATED 24 .03.2015, FOR THE A.Y. 2008-2009. 2. THE ASSESSEE HAS BEEN NOTIFIED THE DATE OF HEARING THROUGH REGISTERED POST AT THE CORRECT ADDRESS GIVE N IN THE 2 ITA.NO.2488/DEL./2015 SHRI RAM AVTAR, NEW DELHI. APPEAL PAPER. HOWEVER, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF T HE ASSESSEE AT THE TIME OF HEARING OF THE APPEAL. IT, THEREFORE , APPEARS THAT ASSESSEE IS NO MORE INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE A PPEAL. THEREFORE, THE APPEAL OF ASSESSEE IS LIABLE TO BE D ISMISSED AS UN- ADMITTED. 3. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE AND HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RULES AND FO LLOWING VARIOUS DECISIONS OF DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN CLUDING THAT OF MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DEL.); HO NBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT DECISION IN THE CASE OF E STATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT 223 ITR 480 (MP), AND ALSO THE DECISION OF HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN THE C ASE OF CIT VS. B. BHATTACHARGEE & ANOTHER (118 ITR 461 AT PAGE 477-478) WHEREIN THEIR LORDSHIPS HELD THAT THE APPE AL DOES NOT MEAN, MERE FILING OF THE MEMO OF APPEAL BUT EFF ECTIVELY PURSUING THE SAME, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DI SMISSED AS UN-ADMITTED. 3 ITA.NO.2488/DEL./2015 SHRI RAM AVTAR, NEW DELHI. 4. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMIS SED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT. SD/- SD/- (O.P. KANT) (BHAVNESH SAINI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DELHI, DATED 05 TH JULY, 2018 VBP/- COPY TO 1. THE APP ELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. CIT(A) CONCERNED 4. CIT CONCERNED 5. D.R. ITAT F BENCH, DELHI 6. GUARD FILE. // BY ORDER // ASSISTANT REGISTRAR : ITAT DELHI BENCHES : DELHI.