M/s Truthful Developers Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi V. ITO, New Delhi

ITA 2489/DEL/2013

• Counselvise Citation: 248920114 RSA 2013
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 6 month(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 29-10-2015
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: H
• Next Hearing Date: 29-10-2015
• Assessment Year: 2003-2004
• Appeal Filed On: 29-04-2013
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: O P MEENA

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES: H NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI J.SUDHAKAR REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDI CIAL MEMBER ITA NO: 2489/DEL/2013 AY : - 2003-04 TRUTHFUL DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. VS. ITO B-44, SECOND FLOOR, JANGPURA B, WARD 16(4) NEW DELHI 110 014 NEW DELHI. PAN AABCT7759D (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SHRI O.P. MEENA, SR DR DATE OF HEARING : 29.10.2015 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 2 9 .10.2015 O R D E R PER SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA JUDICIAL MEMBER THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 6.2.2013 OF CIT(A)-19, NEW DELHI U/S 143(3). 2. THE CASE WAS EARLIER FIXED FOR HEARING ON 5.3. 2014, 20.08.2014, 30.4.2015. NONE ATTENDED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE BEFORE US. NO APPLICATION WAS MOVED SEEKING ADJOURNMENT OF THE CASE. 3. IN THE PECULIAR FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES AND KEEP ING IN VIEW THE PROVISIONS OF ORDER V RULE 19A OF THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUN AL RULES, AS WERE CONSIDERED IN THE CASES OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 3 8 ITD 320 (DEL); AND LATE TUKOJI ITA NO. 2489/DEL/2013 TRUTHFUL DEV ELOPERS PVT. LTD. VS. ITO 2 RAO HOLKAR, 223 ITR 480 (MP), CIT VS. B.N. BHA TTACHARGEE AND ANOTHER, REPORTED IN 118 ITR 461 [RELEVANT PAGES 477 & 478], LATE MR S. BANU E COWASJI VS. CIT 276 ITR 594 (MP) WE DISMISS THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE AS SESSEE. THE ASSESSEE, IF SO ADVISED, SHALL BE FREE TO MOVE THIS TRIBUNAL PRAYIN G FOR RECALLING OF THIS ORDER AND EXPLAINING THE REASONS FOR NON-COMPLIANCE ETC. AND IF THE BENCH IS SO SATISFIED ABOUT THE REASONS ETC., THEN THIS ORDER SHALL BE RECALLED . 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESS EE IS DISMISSED FOR NON PROSECUTION. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 29.10. 2015. SD/- SD/- (J. SUDHAKAR REDDY) (J. SUDHAKAR REDDY) (J. SUDHAKAR REDDY) (J. SUDHAKAR REDDY) (SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA) (SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA) (SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA) (SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDIC IAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICI AL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICI AL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICI AL MEMBER DATED: THE 29. 10. 2015 VEENA COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR 6. GUARD FILE BY ORDER DY. REGISTRAR ITA NO. 2489/DEL/2013 TRUTHFUL DEV ELOPERS PVT. LTD. VS. ITO 3 SL. NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 1. DATE OF DICTATION BY THE AUTHOR 29.10.2015 2. DRAFT PLACED BEFORE THE DICTATING MEMBER 29.10. 2015 3. DRAFT PLACED BEFORE THE SECOND MEMBER 4. DRAFT APPROVED BY THE SECOND MEMBER 5. DATE OF APPROVED ORDER COMES TO THE SR. PS 6. DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT OF ORDER 7. DATE OF FILE SENT TO THE BENCH CLERK 8. DATE ON WHICH FILE GOES TO THE HEAD CLERK 9. DATE OF DISPATCH OF ORDER