TWINSTAR JUPITER CO OP HSG SOC LTD, MUMBAI V. ITO WD 12(2)(3), MUMBAI

ITA 2490/MUM/2012

• Counselvise Citation: [2015] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 92554 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 1 month(s) 1 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 15-05-2015
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Bench Allotted: E
• Next Hearing Date: 13-11-2014
• Assessment Year: 2001-2002
• Appeal Filed On: 13-04-2012
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K ** BZ U;K;IHB EQACBZ ESAA IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL E BENCH, MUMBAI JH TH + ,L + IUUW] YS[KK LNL; ,OA JH VFER KQDYK] U;KF;D LNL; DS LE{KA BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER VK;DJ VIHY LA[;K@ ITA NO 2490/MUM2012 ( FU/KKZJ.K OKZ / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2001 - 02 ) TWIN STAR JUPITER CO - OP HSG. SOC. LTD. JUPITER APARTMENTS, 41, CUFFE PARADE,K MUMBAI 400 005. VS.` INCOME TAX OFFICER, 12(2)(3) 01 ST FLOOR, AAYKAR BHAVAN, MARINE LINES MUMBAI. LFKK;H YS[KK LA[;K@TH VKB VKJ LA[;K@ PAN/GIR NO. AABTB 0015E APPELLANT RESPONDENT ORDER PER G.S. PANNU, AM THE CAPTIONED APPEAL PREFERRED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE CIT(A) DATED 25.01.2012 WHICH IN TURN HAS ARISEN FROM AN ORDER PASSED BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER U/S 143 (3) R.W.S 254 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961( HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE ACT) DATED 12.11.2009 PERTAINING TO ASSESSMENT Y EAR 2001 - 02 . FU/KZKFJFR FD VKSJ LS @ ASSESSEE BY NONE IZR;FKHZ FD VKSJ LS @ RESPONDENT BY SMT. N. V. NADKARNI LQUOKBZ FD RKJH[K @ DATE OF HEARING 30.04.2015 ?KKSK.KK FD RKJH[K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 15 .5.2015 VK;DJ VIHY LA[;K@ ITA NO 2490/MUM2012 ( FU/KKZJ.K OKZ / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2001 - 02) 2 | P A G E 2 ON THE APPOINTED DATE OF HEARING, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE , WHEREAS, SMT. N.V. NADKARNI, LD. CIT(DR) APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE R EVENUE. AT THE TIME OF HEARING , OUR ATTENTION WAS DRAWN TO A COMMUNICATION OF THE ASSESSEE DATED 10.11.2014, A COPY OF WHICH IS ON RECORD , I N TERMS OF WHICH , IT IS STATED THAT ASSESSEE DOES NOT WISH TO PURSUE THE CAPTIONED APPEAL DUE TO S MALLNESS OF THE MATTER. ACCORDINGLY, THE ASSESSEE SEEKS PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL. 3. THE LD DR DID NOT OBJECT TO THE PLEA OF THE ASSESSED. 4. AS A CONSEQUENCE, WE ACCEPT THE PLEA OF THE ASSESSEE AND DISMISS THE CAPTIONED APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN. 5 . IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 15 TH DAY OF MAY 2015. SD/ - SD/ - (AMIT SHUKLA) (G.S. PANNU) (JUDICIAL MEMBER/ U;KF;D LNL; ) (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER/ YS[KK LNL; ) MUMBAI DATED 15 - 05 - 2015 SKS SR. P.S, COPY TO: 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. THE CONCERNED CIT(A) 4. THE CONCERNED CIT 5. THE DR, E BENCH, ITAT, MUMBAI BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI