, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL D BENCH, CHENNAI ... , . , , BEFORE SHRI N.R.S.GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI A.MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ I.T.A.NOS.2511, 2512 & 2513 /MDS./2014 ( !' #' / ASSESSMENT YEARS :2009-10, 2009-10 & 2009-10) MR.K.SURESH , PROP.SURESH MEDICALS, G.K.V.HOSPITAL, MANGALAPURAM BUS STOP, MEDICAL COLLEGE ROAD, THANJAVUR 613 017. VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), THANJAVUR. PAN BGEPS 1627 Q ( / APPELLANT ) ( / RESPONDENT ) $% & ' / APPELLANT BY : NONE ()$% & ' / RESPONDENT BY : MR.N.MADHAVAN,JCIT, D.R * + & ,- / DATE OF HEARING : 07.05.2015 .# & ,- /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 07.05.2015 ITA NO.2511 TO 2513 /MDS/2014 2 / O R D E R PER A.MOHAN ALANKAMONY , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: THESE THREE APPEALS ARE FILED B Y THE ASSESSEE, AGGRIEVED BY THE SEPARATE ORDERS OF THE LEARNED COM MISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(A), TIRUCHIRAPALLI PASSED UNDER SECTION S 271A, 271B & 271(1)(C) RESPECTIVELY READ WITH SECTION 250 OF THE ACT IN ITA NO. 98/2012-13/CIT(A)/TRY, ITA NO.99/2012-13/CIT(A)/TRY AND ITA NO.100/2012-13/CIT(A)/TRY, ALL DATED 18.07.2014 AND FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10. 2. WHEN THE THREE APPEALS WERE TAKEN UP FOR HEARIN G, NOBODY APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE TO PURSUE THE AP PEALS. THEREFORE, WE ARE OF THE OPINION THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN CONDUCTING THE CASES, HENCE FOLLOWING THE DECIS ION OF THE DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF C.I.T. VS. MUL TIPLAN (INDIA) LTD.(38 ITD 320) (DEL.), WE HEREBY DISMISS BOTH THE APPEALS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE . ITA NO.2511 TO 2513 /MDS/2014 3 3. IN THE RESULT, THE THREE APPEALS FILED BY ASSESS EE ARE DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT AFTER CONCLU SION OF HEARING ON 7 TH MAY, 2015 . SD/- SD/- ( . . . ) ( N.R.S.GANESAN ) ( . '#$ %' ) (A.MOHAN ALANKAMONY) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER CHENNAI, DATED THE 7 TH MAY, 2015. K S SUNDARAM. & (,/0 1 0#, /COPY TO: 1. $% /APPELLANT 2. ()$% /RESPONDENT 3. * 2, ( ) /CIT(A) 4. * 2, /CIT 5. 05 (,6! /DR 6. ' 7+ /GF