METIM INVESTMENT AND TRADING PVT. LTD., MUMBAI V. DCIT - 3(2), MUMBAI

ITA 2531/MUM/2013

• Counselvise Citation: [2015] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 92475 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 1 month(s) 7 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 11-05-2015
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Bench Allotted: B
• Next Hearing Date: 11-05-2015
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 03-04-2013
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K ** CH U;K;IHB EQACBZ ESAA IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B BENCH, MUMBAI JH TH + ,L + IUUW] YS[KK LNL; ,OA JH VFER KQDYK] U;KF;D LNL; DS LE{KA BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER VK;DJ VIHY LA[;K@ ITA NO 2531/MUM/2013 ( FU/KKZJ.K OKZ / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2009 - 10 ) METMIN INVESTMENT AND TRADING PVT. LTD. 161/162, MITTAL COURT, A WINGH, NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI 400 021. VS.` DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 3(2) MUMBAI. LFKK;H YS[KK LA[;K@TH VKB VKJ LA[;K@ PAN/GIR NO. AA CCM2480P APPELLANT RESPONDENT ORDER PER G.S. PANNU, AM THE CAPTIONED APPEAL PREFERRED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE CIT(A) DATED 14.09.2011 WHICH IN TURN HAS ARISEN FROM AN ORDER PASSED BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER U/S 143 (3) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961( HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE ACT) DATED 19.12.2011 PERTAINING TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009 - 10. FU/KZKFJFR FD VKSJ LS @ ASSESSEE BY SHRI RAVI SAUD IZR;FKHZ FD VKSJ LS @ RESPONDENT BY SHRI YOGESH KAMAT LQUOKBZ FD RKJH[K @ DATE OF HEARING 11 .05.2015 ?KKSK.KK FD RKJH[K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 11 .5.2015 M/S BILASRAI KAUSHIK CH ARITABLE TRUST 2 | P A G E 2 AT THE TIME OF HEARING, THE LD. REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ASSESSEE SUBMITTED THAT THE ASSESSE E , NO LONGER W IS H TO PROSECUTE THE PRESENT APPEAL AND THE SAME MAY BE DISMISSED AS WITHDRA W N . 3. THE LD DR RAISED NO OBJECTION, IF THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 4. ACCORDINGLY, IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, WE ACCEDE TO THE REQUEST MADE BY THE ASSESSEE AND DISMISS THE APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN. 5. RESULTANTLY, THE CAPTIONED APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN, AS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT IN THE PRESENCE OF BOTH THE PARTIES AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE HEARING OF APPEAL TODAY I.E. 11.5.2015. SD/ - SD/ - (AMIT SHUKLA) (G.S. PANNU) (JUDICIAL MEMBER/ U;KF;D LNL; ) (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER/ YS[KK LNL; ) MUMBAI DATED 11 - 05 - 2015 SKS SR. P.S, M/S BILASRAI KAUSHIK CH ARITABLE TRUST 3 | P A G E COPY TO: 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. THE CONCERNED CIT(A) 4. THE CONCERNED CIT 5. THE DR, B BENCH, ITAT, MUMBAI BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI