IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH A NEW DELHI (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 2532/DEL/2019 ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10 VASP ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD., 66-A/5, NEW ROHTAK ROAD, KAROL BAGH, NEW DELHI-110051 (PAN: AACCV0567A) VS ITO, WARD- 26(2), NEW DELHI. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY: SHRI ANKIT JAIN, ADVOCATE RESPONDENT BY: SHRI M. BARNWAL, SR. DR DATE OF HEARING : 16.11.2020 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 16.11.2020 ORDER PER G.S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF LEARNED CIT(A)-28, NEW DELHI DATED 21.01.2019 AND PERTA INS TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10. 2. THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE, VIDE HIS LETTER DATED 30.10.2020, HAS INTIMATED THE TRIBUNAL THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS O PTED TO SETTLE THE DISPUTE ITA 2532/D/2019 2 RELATING TO THE TAX ARREARS FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR UNDER CONSIDERATION UNDER THE VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, 2020. 3. CONSIDERING THE AFORESAID SITUATION, THE CAPTIO NED APPEAL IS CONSIGNED TO RECORDS AND TREATED AS DISMISSED. 4. HOWEVER, THE AFORESAID IS SUBJECT TO A CAVEAT TH AT IN CASE THE DISPUTE RELATING TO TAX ARREARS FOR THE CAPTIONED ASSESSMEN T YEAR IS NOT ULTIMATELY RESOLVED IN TERMS OF THE AFORESTATED ACT, THE APPEL LANT (I.E., THE ASSESSEE) SHALL BE AT LIBERTY TO APPROACH THE TRIBUNAL FOR REINSTITUTI ON OF THE APPEAL AND THE TRIBUNAL SHALL CONSIDER SUCH APPLICATION APPROPRIAT ELY AS PER LAW. THE RESPONDENT (I.E., THE REVENUE) HAS NO OBJECTION WIT H REGARD TO THE AFORESAID CAVEAT. 5. IN VIEW OF THE AFORESAID, THE APPEAL IS CONSIGNE D TO RECORD AND, FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES, IS TREATED AS DISMISSED. ABOVE DECISION WAS ANNOUNCED ON CONCLUSION OF VIRTU AL HEARING IN THE PRESENCE OF BOTH THE PARTIES ON 16 TH NOVEMBER, 2020. SD/- SD/- (AMIT SHUKLA) ( G.S. PANNU ) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT GS ITA 2532/D/2019 3 COPY FORWARDED TO: - 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR