IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD BENCH B AHMEDABAD BEFORE S/SHRI MUKUL SHRAWAT, JM AND D. C. AGRAWAL, AM ITA NO.254/AHD/2008 ASST. YEAR 19 91-92 SHRI JAYANTILAL RAMANLAL TAILOR, 14, SHIVANGINI BUNGLOW, ATHWALINES, SURAT. VS. ASSTT. CIT, CIR.3, SURAT. PAN :ABEPT 6213B (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY NONE RESPONDENT BY SHRI K. MADHUSUDAN, SR.DR O R D E R PER D.C. AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER . THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A)-II, AHMEDABAD DATED 27-11-2007 RELATING TO A SSESSMENT YEAR 1991-92. 2. THE ASSESSEE IS SERVED, HOWEVER, ON THE DATE OF HEARING NOBODY APPEARED FOR THE ASSESSEE. AN ADJOURNMENT APPLICATI ON HAS BEEN FILED. SUCH CASUAL APPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEVERAL TI MES IN THE PAST AND THE TRIBUNAL HAD PASSED FOR EXAMPLE DATED 03.05.2008, 2 0.03.2008 & 28.04.2010. IT SEEMS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT VERY SERIOUS IN PURSUING THE APPEAL. NO DEFINITE REASON FOR APPEARING BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL HAS BEEN GIVEN. WE ARE NOT SATISFIED WITH THE REASONS FOR AD JOURNMENT. HENCE, THE APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT IS REJECTED. THEREFORE, FOLLOWING THE DECISION 2 OF ITAT DELHI BENCH IN THE CASE OF CIT VS MULTIPLA N INDIA (PVT.) LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DEL) WE DISMISS THE APPEAL OF THE ASSES SEE IN LIMINE. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE ASSESSEES APPEAL STANDS DISM ISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 9/6/2010 SD/- SD/- (MUKUL SHRAWAT) (D. C. AGRAWAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AHMEDABAD, DATED 9/6/2010. MAHATA/- COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. THE CIT CONCERNED 4. THE CIT(A) CONCERNED 5. THE DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. GUARD FILE BY ORDER D Y. REGISTRAR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD