, A/ SMC , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A/SMC BENCH, CHENNAI . , BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A.NO.2549 /MDS./2016 ( ASSESSMENT YEAR :, 2008-09) M/S.A.R.BUILDERS PVT LTD ., 14, SYDENHAMS ROAD, CHENNAI 600 112. VS. THE DCIT, COMPANY CIRCLE I(1), CHENNAI -34. PAN AACCA 5286 F ( / APPELLANT ) ( / RESPONDENT ) / APPELLANT BY : NONE / RESPONDENT BY : MR.V.SREENIVASAN, JCIT, D.R ! ' / DATE OF HEARING : 10.07.2017 #$%& ! ' /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 10.07.2017 / O R D E R PER CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: THIS APPEAL IS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE, AGGRIEVED BY THE ORDER OF THE LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(A)-1, CHENNA I DATED 07.06.2016 PERTAINING TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-09. 2. IN THIS CASE, I NOTICE FROM THE RECORD THAT THI S APPEAL WAS ADJOURNED FOR NON-APPEARANCE OF THE COUNSEL ON 02. 01.2017 AND AT THE REQUEST OF LD.A.R ON 21.02.2017 & 02.05.2017 FO R FILING ITA NO. /MDS/2017 2 FORM NO.35 AND PAPER BOOK. SINCE BOTH THE A.R AND D .R WERE INTIMATED THE NEXT DATE OF HEARING I.E. 10.07.2017 IN THE OPEN COURT ON LAST HEARING I.E. ON 02.05.2017, NO NOTICE WAS SENT . HOWEVER, WHEN THE APPEAL CAME UP FOR HEARING ON 10.07.2017, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE, NOR ANY ADJOURNMENT PETITIO N WAS MOVED TO PURSUE THE APPEAL. THEREFORE, I AM OF THE OPINION THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN CONDUCTING THE CASE, HENCE FO LLOWING THE DECISION OF THE DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF C .I.T. VS. MULTIPLAN (INDIA) LTD.(38 ITD 320) (DEL.), I HEREBY DISMISS T HE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE . 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF ASSESSEE IS DISMIS SED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT AFTER CONCLUSI ON OF HEARING ON 10 TH OF JULY, 2017. SD/- ( ) ( CHANDRA POOJARI ) /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER CHENNAI, DATED THE 10 TH JULY, 2017 . K S SUNDARAM. ' ( )!*+ ,+%! / COPY TO: 1 . / APPELLANT 3. ' ' -! () / CIT(A) 5. +0 1 )!)23 / DR 2. / RESPONDENT 4. ' ' -! / CIT 6. 1 45 6 / GF