Shri Sanjay Kumar Sureka, Kolkata V. D.C.I.T.,CC-3(3), Kolkata

ITA 2556/KOL/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 104 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6335 (ITAT-KOLKATA)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 5 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 14-12-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: PartlyAllowed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Assessment Year: 2012-2013
• Appeal Filed On: 09-12-2019
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Assessee Lawyers: SERVING OF NOTICE
• Keywords: Set aside

Judgement Text

1 ITA No.2556/Kol/2019 AY. 2012-13 Sanjay Kumar Sureka आयकर अपील य अधीकरण, यायपीठ –“B” कोलकाता, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH: KOLKATA [Before Shri P.M. Jagtap, Hon. V.P (KZ) and Shri A. T. Varkey, JM] ITA No. 2556/Kol/2019 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Shri Sanjay Kumar Sureka PAN: AMSPS0990B Vs. DCIT, Central Circle-3(3), Kolkata Appellant Respondent Date of Hearing (Virtual) 02.12.2021 Date of Pronouncement 15 .12.2021 For the Appellant Shri Avijit Dey, Advocate, ld.AR For the Respondent Shri Partha Pratim Barman, Add CIT ORDER Per Bench: This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of Ld. CIT(A), Kolkata-21 dated 22.10.2019 for AY 2012-13. 2. At the outset, the Ld. AR drew our attention to the fact that the impugned order of the Ld. CIT(A) is an ex parte order. According to the Ld. AR, the assessee had been regularly present before the Ld. CIT(A) however on the last occasion when the matter was fixed, the date of hearing was not conveyed to the assessee by serving of notice, therefore, the assessee could not be present before the Ld. CIT(A) which prompted him to dismiss the appeal ex-parte. According to the Ld. AR, if given an opportunity, the assessee would undertake to be present before the Ld. CIT(A) so that the CIT(A) is able to pass the order on merits after hearing the assessee. 3. Having heard both the parties, we note that as per the scheme of the Act if an assessee is aggrieved by the order of A.O then that person/assessee has a statutory right of appeal before the Ld. CIT(A); and if an assessee files an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) he is bound by law to decide the appeal on merits. If ex parte orders are passed without 2 ITA No.2556/Kol/2019 AY. 2012-13 Sanjay Kumar Sureka hearing the assessee then the statutory right of appeal will be meaningless/illusory. Therefore, in this case, since the assessee was not aware of the last date of hearing and since no notice was served upon him, we are inclined to set aside the impugned order of Ld. CIT(A) and restore the appeal back to the Ld. CIT(A) to decide the appeal on merits after hearing the assessee. The assessee is directed to be diligent and be present and to file written submission along with supporting documents to substantiate his stands before the Ld. CIT(A) so as to enable him to pass a reasoned order. 3. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order is pronounced in the open court on 15 -12-2021 Sd/- Sd/- (P. M. Jagtap) (A. T. Varkey) Vice-President Judicial Member Dated : 15 -12-2021 RS Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. Appellant –Shri Sanjay Kumar Sureka, 27 ShakespareSarani, Kolkata- 700 017. 2 Respondent –DCIT, Central Circle 3(3), Kolkata, AaykarBhawanPoorva, 110 Shanti Pally, Kolkata-700 107. 3. 4. 5. CIT(A)-, Kolkata (sent through e-mail) CIT- , Kolkata. DR, ITAT, Kolkata. (sent through e-mail) By order, /True Copy, Senior P.S./D.D.O Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Kolkata