Shri Pravinbhai Mohanbhai Kheni, Surat V. The ACIT.,C.C.-2, Surat

ITA 2561/AHD/2009

• Counselvise Citation: [2013] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 67672 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 11 month(s) 27 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 05-09-2013
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: C
• Next Hearing Date: 14-08-2013
• Assessment Year: 2006-2007
• Appeal Filed On: 08-09-2009
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: T P KRISHNA KUMAR

Judgement Text

, , , , C, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT AHMEDABAD, C BENCH . .. . . .. . , !' !' !' !', , , , #$ %&'( #$ %&'( #$ %&'( #$ %&'(, , , , )* + ) ' )* + ) ' )* + ) ' )* + ) ' BEFORE S/SHRI G.C. GUPTA, VICE-PRESIDENT AND ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) ITA NO.2561/AHD/2009 [ASSTT.YEAR : 2006-2007] SHRI PRAVINBHAI MOHANBHAI KHENI 73, SADHANA SOCIETY VARACHHA ROAD, SURAT. PAN : AFZPK 3277 P /VS. ACIT, CENT.CIR.2 SURAT. ( (( (-. -. -. -. / APPELLANT) ( (( (/0-. /0-. /0-. /0-. / RESPONDENT) 1& 2 3 )/ ASSESSEE BY : NONE + 2 3 )/ REVENUE BY : SHRI T.P. KRISHNAKUMAR, CIT-DR 5 2 &(*/ DATE OF HEARING : 14 TH AUGUST, 2013 678 2 &(*/ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 5.9.2013 )9 / O R D E R PER G.C. GUPTA, VICE-PRESIDENT : THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-2007, IS DIRE CTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A)-II, AHMEDABAD DATED 5.8.200 9. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF O F THE ASSESSEE- APPELLANT. APPLICATION OF THE ASSESSEE FOR ADJOURN MENT OF THE CASE HAS BEEN REJECTED BY THE BENCH, AS NO SUFFICIENT REASON FOR ADJOURNMENT HAS BEEN MENTIONED IN THE APPLICATION. THIS CASE H AS BEEN ADJOURNED ON NUMBER OF OCCASIONS ON THE REQUEST OF THE ASSESS EE. ON 2/7/2013, THIS CASE WAS ADJOURNED TO 14/8/2013 AT THE REQUEST OF THE ASSESSEE, ITA NO.2561/AHD/2009 -2- AND IT WAS SPECIFICALLY DIRECTED BY THE BENCH THAT IT SHALL BE LAST OPPORTUNITY TO BOTH THE SIDES. ON EARLIER OCCASIO NS ALSO, THE ASSESSEE WAS GIVEN LAST CHANCE AS PER THE NOTING OF THE BENC H ON THE ORDER SHEET. IN THESE FACTS, IT IS INFERRED THAT THE ASS ESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSING ITS APPEAL. THEREFORE, FOLLOWING THE DECIS ION OF DELHI BENCH IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN (INDIA) LTD. 38 ITD 320, W E DISMISS THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON THE DATE MENTIONE D HEREINABOVE. SD/- SD/- ( %&'( %&'( %&'( %&'( / ANIL CHATURVEDI) )* + )* + )* + )* + /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ( . .. . . .. . /G.C. GUPTA) !' !' !' !' /VICE-PRESIDENT C OPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1) : APPELLANT 2) : RESPONDENT 3) : CIT(A) 4) : CIT CONCERNED 5) : DR, ITAT. BY ORDER DR/AR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD