Mr. Girishkumar C. Patel, Gandhinagar V. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Gandhinagar

ITA 2566/AHD/2013

• Counselvise Citation: [2016] 132 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 0171 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 11 month(s) 26 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 27-10-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Next Hearing Date: 27-10-2016
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 31-10-2013
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: SONIA KUMAR

Judgement Text

, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SMC BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER ./ ITA.NO.2566/AHD/2013 / ASSTT. YEAR: 2009-2010 MR.GIRISHKUMAR C. PATEL PROP. PATEL TRANSPORTATION SARDHAV GANDHINAGAR 382 640. VS ITO, WARD-2 GANDHINAGAR. ! / (APPELLANT) '# ! / (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE REVENUE BY : MS.SONIA KUMAR, DR / DATE OF HEARING : 27/10/2016 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 27/10/2016 $%/ O R D E R ASSESSEE IS IN APPEAL BEFORE TRIBUNAL AGAINST ORDER OF LD.CIT(A), GANDINAGAR DATED 23.8.2013 FOR THE ASSTT.YEAR 2009-10. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF O F THE ASSESSEE DESPITE SERVICE OF NOTICE THROUGH RPAD POST. POSTAL ACKNOW LEDGEMENT RECEIPT HAS BEEN PLACED ON. ASSESSEE HAS NOT FILED ANY APPLICATION F OR ADJOURNMENT OF THE CASE. THUS, IT APPEARS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT SERIOUS IN PURS UING WITH ITS APPEAL, AND THEREFORE, BY FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE ITAT, DELHI BENCH IN CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA PVT. LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DELHI), I DISMISS THE APPEAL OF T HE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON 27 TH OCTOBER, 2016 AT AHMEDABAD. SD/- (RAJPAL YADAV) JUDICIAL MEMBER AHMEDABAD; DATED 27/10/2016