Mayur Mansukhlal Shah, Ahmedabad V. ITO, Ward-7(2)(3), Ahmedabad

ITA 2575/AHD/2017

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 107 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6809 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 6 month(s) 12 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 02-06-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Next Hearing Date: 26-03-2020
• Assessment Year: misc
• Appeal Filed On: 21-11-2017
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: S S SHUKLA
• Assessee Lawyers: PARIN SHAH ARS; S N SOPARKAR
• Section: 143(3)

Judgement Text

, SMC IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SMC BENCH, AHMEDABAD (THROUGH VIRTUAL COURT) BEFORE SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS. MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ./ I.T.A. NO. 2575/AHD/2017 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2014-15) MAYUR MANSUKHLA SHAH E-73/1127, KRISHNANAGAR HOUSING BOARD, NARODA, AHMEDABAD-382345 / VS. ITO WARD-7(2)(3), AHMEDABAD ./ ./ PAN/GIR NO. : CPLPS1936K ( / APPELLANT ) .. ( / RESPONDENT ) / APPELLANT BY : SHRI S. N. SOPARKAR, SR. ADV. & SHRI PARIN SHAH, ARS / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI S. S. SHUKLA, SR. DR / DATE OF HEARING 01/06/2021 !'# / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 02/06/2021 $%/ O R D E R PER MADHUMITA ROY, JM: THE CAPTIONED APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED AT THE INSTANCE OF THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-7, AHMEDABAD (CIT(A) IN SHORT), DATED 06.09.2017 ARI SING IN THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 28.11.2016 PASSED BY THE ITO , WARD-7(2)(3), AHMEDABAD UNDER SECTION 143(3) OF THE INCOME TAX AC T, 1961 (THE ACT) CONCERNING AY 2014-15. 2. THE CAPTIONED ASSESSEE HAS SOUGHT TO WITHDRAW TH E APPEAL LISTED ABOVE ON THE GROUND THAT HE HAS OPTED TO AVAIL BENE FITS OF VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, 2020 (VSV). WHEN THE MATTER WAS C ALLED FOR HEARING, THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE AT THE OUTSET HAS SUBMITTED THAT THEY DO ITA NO. 2575/AHD/17 [MAYUR MANSUKHLAL SHAH VS. ITO] A.Y. 2014-15 - 2 - NOT SEEK TO PURSUE THE SAID APPEALS OWING TO EXERCI SE OF OPTION FOR AVAILING VSV SCHEME AND CONSEQUENTLY REQUESTED THAT HIS APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF APPEAL MAY PLEASE BE GRANTED. REFERE NCE WAS ALSO MADE TO WRITTEN REQUESTS IN THIS REGARD. 3. THE LD. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE REVE NUE STATED THAT HE HAS NO OBJECTION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEALS IN THE CIR CUMSTANCES NARRATED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. 4. IN THE LIGHT OF WRITTEN REQUESTS MADE ON BEHALF OF THE CAPTIONED PARTY, THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. HOWEV ER, IN THE EVENT, THE ASSESSEE FAILS TO AVAIL THE BENEFIT OF VSV SCHEME F OR ANY BONAFIDE REASONS, THEN THE ASSESSEE CONCERNED WILL BE AT LIB ERTY TO SEEK RESTORATION OF ORIGINAL APPEAL FOR HEARING BEFORE ITAT IN ACCOR DANCE WITH LAW. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE CAPTIONED APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. SD/- SD/- (WASEEM AHMED) (MADHUM ITA ROY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER AHMEDABAD: DATED 02/06/2021 TRUE COPY TANMAY !' #' / COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO:- 1. / REVENUE 2. $ / ASSESSEE 3. ) *+ , / CONCERNED CIT 4. ,- / CIT (A) 5. 012 33*+, *+#, 56$)$ / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. 289 : / GUARD FILE. BY ORDER / $% , ;/5 *+#, 56$)$ < 1.DATE OF DICTATION ON 01.06.2021 AS PER VSV FO RMAT 2.DATE ON WHICH THE TYPED DRAFT IS PLACED BEFORE TH E DICTATING MEMBER 01.06.2021 3.DATE ON WHICH THE APPROVED DRAFT COMES TO THE SR. P.S./P.S. .06.2021 4.DATE ON WHICH THE FAIR ORDER IS PLACED BEFORE THE DICTATING MEMBER FOR PRONOUNCEMENT .06.2021 5.DATE ON WHICH THE FAIR ORDER COMES BACK TO THE SR .P.S./P.S .06.2021 6.DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE BENCH CLERK 02.06.2021 7.DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE HEAD CLERK . 8.THE DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE ASSTT. REG ISTRAR FOR SIGNATURE ON THE ORDER 9.DATE OF DESPATCH OF THE ORDER THIS ORDER PRONOUNCED ON 0 2/06/2021