Paschim Gujarat Vij Co.Ltd., Baroda V. The Income tax Officer,Ward-4(2), Baroda

ITA 2577/AHD/2011

• Counselvise Citation: [2015] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 85762 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 4 month(s) 17 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 04-03-2015
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Assessment Year: 2008-2009
• Appeal Filed On: 17-10-2011
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: ROOP CHAND

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD B BENCH BEFORE: SHRI MUKUL KR. SHRAWAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTAN T MEMBER PASCHIM GUJARAT VIJ CO. LTD, SARDAR PATEL VIDYUT BHAVAN, RACE COURSE CIRCLE, BARODA-390007 PAN: AADCP1453C (APPELLANT) VS INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 4(2), BARODA (RESPONDENT) REVENUE BY: SHRI ROOP CHAND, SR. D.R. ASSESSEE BY: NONE DATE OF HEARING : 03-03-2015 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 04-03- 2015 / ORDER PER : ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:- THIS IS THE ASSESSEES APPEAL AGAINST THE ORDER OF LD. CIT(A)-III, BARODA DATED 28-07-2011 FOR A.Y. 2008-09. 2. A NOTICE WAS ISSUED BY THE REGISTRY ON 04/02/201 5 AND WAS ALSO SERVED TO THE ASSESSEE INFORMING IT ABOUT FIXING THE DATE OF HEARING ON 03/03/2015. ITA NO. 2577/AHD/2011 ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-09 I.T.A NO. 2577/AHD/2011 A.Y. 2008-09 PAGE NO PASCHIM GUJARAT VIJ CO. LTD VS. ITO 2 BUT NO ONE APPEARED ON THE DATE OF HEARING NOR AN A DJOURNMENT APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE WAS FILED. U NDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES, WE ARE OF THE VIEW THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING WITH ITS APPEAL. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF HON'BLE MADHYA PRADES H HIGH COURT DECISION IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKARS VS. CWT (1997) 223 ITR 480 (M.P.) AND OF HONBLE DELHI TRIBUNAL DECISION IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (PVT) LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DELHI) , WE DISMISS THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE. THE ASSESSEE SHALL HOWEVER BE AT LIBERTY TO APPROACH THE TRIBUNAL FOR RECALLING OF THIS ORDER, IF PREVENTED BY SUFFICIENT CAUSE FOR NON-APPEARANCE ON THE DATE OF HEARING. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON THE DATE MENTIONE D HEREINABOVE AT CAPTION PAGE SD/- SD/- (MUKUL KR. SHRAWAT) (ANIL CHATURVEDI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AHMEDABAD : DATED 04/03/2015 AK / COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO:- 1. ASSESSEE 2. REVENUE 3. CONCERNED CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. GUARD FILE. BY ORDER/ , / ,