Shri Sanjay Binodkumar Kejriwal, Surat V. The Dy.CIT.,Circle-2, Surat

ITA 2577/AHD/2013

• Counselvise Citation: [2016] 132 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 0095 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 7 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 09-11-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Next Hearing Date: 08-11-2016
• Assessment Year: 2007-2008
• Appeal Filed On: 01-11-2013
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SMC BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER ./ ITA.NO.2577/AHD/2013 / ASSTT. YEAR: 2007-2008 SHRI SANJAY BINODKUMAR KEJRIWALA PROP: OF M/S.NAVIN PRINTS 810, TRADE CENTRE RING ROAD SURAT. PAN : AGMPK 2744 B VS DCIT, CIR.2 SURAT. ! / (APPELLANT) '# ! / (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE REVENUE BY : SHRI MUDIT NAGPAL, SR.DR / DATE OF HEARING : 08/11/2016 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 09/11/2016 $%/ O R D E R ASSESSEE IS APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL AGAINST THE ORDER OF LD.CIT(A)- II, SURAT DATED 12.9.2013 PASSED FOR THE ASSTT.YEAR 2007-08. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF O F THE ASSESSEE. NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SENT THROUGH RPAD POST, HOWEVER, THE SAME WAS RETURNED BY POSTAL AUTHORITY WITH REMARK LEFT. THE ASSESSEE HAS NOT INTIMATED THE REGISTRY ABOUT THE CHANGE OF HIS ADDRESS, NOR FILED ANY APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT OF THE CASE. THEREFORE, IT IS PRESUMED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING WITH HIS APPEAL BEFORE THE T RIBUNAL, THEREFORE, FOLLOWING ORDER OF THE ITAT, DELHI BENCH IN THE CAS E OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN ITA NO.2577/AHD/2013 2 INDIA PVT. LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DELHI), I DISMISS THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISS ED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON 9 TH NOVEMBER, 2016 AT AHMEDABAD. SD- (RAJPAL YADAV) JUDICIAL MEMBER