IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH G NEW DELHI BEFORE : SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI , JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 2593/DEL./2012 ASSTT. YEAR : 2008 - 09 INCOME - TAX OFFICER, VS. SANJAY BASU, WARD 11(2), NEW DELHI. B - 209, C.R. PARK, NEW DELHI. (PAN: AAEPB 7421Q) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : SH. AMRIT KUMAR, SR. DR RESPONDENT BY : SH. SUBIR GAUTAM, FCA DATE OF HEARING : 06. 04.2017 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 06 .04.2017 ORDER PER L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: IT IS APPARENT FROM RECORD THAT THE PRESENT APPEAL HAS BEEN PREFERRED BY THE REVENUE AGAINST THE ACTION OF THE LD. CIT(A) - XII I, NEW DELHI - ORDER DATED 13.03.2012 , WHEREBY HE HAS DELETED THE ADDITIONS AS ENUMERATED IN THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL BEFORE US, THE TAX EFFECT ON WHICH COMES BELOW RS.10 LACS. UNDISPUTEDLY, THE PRESENT APPEAL HAS BEEN PREFERRED BY THE REVENUE IN VIOLATION OF CBDT CIRCULAR NO. 21/2015 DATED 10.12.2015, WHEREIN THE PECUNIARY LIMIT FOR PREFERRING THE APPEAL BY THE REVENUE BEFORE THE ITAT HAS BEEN PRESCRIBED BEYOND RS.10 LACS. THE ABOVE CIRCULAR ON PECUNIARY LIMIT HAS NOW STATUTORY FORCE WITHIN THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 268A OF THE IT ACT. ITA NO. 2593/DEL./2012 2 2. THE LD. DR , HOWEVER, REQUESTED THAT WHILE DISMISSING THE APPEAL AS NOT MAINTAINABLE, IT MAY BE MADE CLEAR THAT THE PRESENT ORDER WILL HAVE NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. 3. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE DISCUSSION, THE PRESENT APPEAL PREFERRED BY THE REVENUE IN VIOLA TION OF CBDT CIRCULAR NO. 21/2015 (SUPRA) IS NOT MAINTAINABLE AND HENCE, THE SAME IS DISMISSED AS SUCH , MAKING IT CLEAR THAT SINCE THE PRESENT APPEAL HAS NOT BEEN DISPOSED OF ON MERITS OF THE APPEAL, BUT DUE TO ABOVE REASON, IT WILL HAVE NO ANY JUDICIAL PR ECEDENCE. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS NOT MAINTAINABLE. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 06.04.2017 . SD/ - SD/ - ( BHAVNESH SAINI ) (L.P. SAHU) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED : 06.04.2017 *AKS/ - COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO: (1) THE APPELLANT (2) THE RESPONDENT (3) COMMISSIONER (4) CIT(A) (5) DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE (6) GUARD FILE BY ORDER ASSISTANT. REGISTRAR INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES, NEW DELHI