1. ITA No.26/Gau/2020 AY 2011-12 Sanjay Arya आयकर अपील य अ धकरण, GAUHATI पीठ, कोलकाता IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL GAUHAT BENCH आभासी मा यम से स ु नवाई Hearing Through Virtual Medium At ITAT, Kolkata सम : ी मनीष बोरड, लेखा एवं ी संजय शमा या यक सद य Before: Shri Manish Borad, Accountant Member and Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Judicial Member आयकर अपील सं.य/ IT A No.26/Gau/2020 Assessment Year: 2011-12 Sanjay Ar ya First Fl., Shyam Kutir, Swahid Dilip Huzuri Path, Sarumotoria, Guwahati- 781006, बनाम V/s. Income Tax Officer Ward 3(4), Guw hati, Aa ykar Bhawan, G.S Road, Christian Basti, Guw ahati- 781005. P AN: AEZP A1017L अपीलाथ /Appellant .. यथ /Respondent अपीलाथ क ओर से/By Appellant None यथ क ओर से/By Respondent Shri N.T.Sherpa, JCIT, Ld.DR स ु नवाई क तार ख/Date of Hearing 17-10-2022 घोषणा क तार ख/ Date of Pronouncement 18 -10-2022 आदेश /O R D E R PER MANISH BORAD, AM. This appeal of the assessee for the assessment year 2011-12 is directed against the order dt. 23-10-2019 passed u/s. 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [ hereinafter, referred to as ‘the Act’] by the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax, Appeals [ in short, hereafter referred to as ‘the ‘ld. CIT(A), Guwahati-2, Guwahati. 2. ITA No.26/Gau/2020 AY 2011-12 Sanjay Arya 2. When the case was called for, none appeared on behalf of the assessee. On perusal of records shows that both ld. CIT(A)’s order is ex parte. The assessee was provided opportunity to appear on fourth occasions, but the assessee failed to appear and file necessary submissions. The ld. CIT(A) accordingly proceeded to pass ex parte order, but summarily dismissed the appeal of the assessee without giving any finding on merits of the case. The ld. DR has no objection if the issue is restored to the ld. CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. We, therefore, under the given facts and circumstances of the case and observing that the order(s) of the ld. CIT(A) is non-speaking restore all the issues raised in the instant appeal to the file of the ld. CIT(A) for fresh adjudication and passing a speaking order. We also direct the assessee to remain attentive to the notice of hearing issued by the ld. CIT(A) and to furnish all necessary details on the very first day of hearing and should not take adjournment unless otherwise required for reasonable cause. The ld. CIT(A) shall also provide reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. Thus, grounds raised by the assessee in appeal number(s) ITA No. 26/Gau/2020 for the AY 2011-12 are allowed for statistical purposes. प रणामत: नधा रती क अपील (ITA No. 26/Gau/2020 for the AY 2011-12 सांि यक उ दे य से मंज ू र क जाती है। 3. In the result, the appeal of the assessee (ITA No. 26/Gau/2020 for the AY 2011-12 is allowed for statistical purposes. आदेश ख ु ले यायपीठ म दनांक 18-10-2022 को उ घो षत। The order pronounced in the open Court on 18 -10-2022 Sd/- Sd/- ( SONJOY SARMA) (MANISH BORAD) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated 18-10-2022 3. ITA No.26/Gau/2020 AY 2011-12 Sanjay Arya आदेश क त ल प अ े षत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1.अपीलाथ /Appellant/: Sanja y Ar ya First Fl., Shyam Kutir, Swahid Dilip Huzuri Path, Sarumotoria, Guwahati-781006, 2. यथ /Respondent/: Income Tax Officer Ward 3(4), Guw hati, Aa ykar Bhaw an, G.S Road, Christian Basti, Guw ahati-781005. 3. संबं धत आयकर आय ु त / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आय ु त- अपील / CIT (A) 5. वभागीय त न ध, आयकर अपील य अ धकरण कोलकाता / DR, ITAT, Gauhati 6.गाड फाइल/Guardfile. By order/आदेश से, /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar ITAT, Kolkata