Suhail Kedia, Amritsar. V. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana

ITA 263/ASR/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2017] 130 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 8732 (ITAT-AMRITSAR)
• Duration Of Justice: 10 month(s) 5 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 08-03-2017
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Next Hearing Date: 08-03-2017
• Assessment Year: 2007-2008
• Appeal Filed On: 03-05-2016
• Result in Favour of: Partly Allowed
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Section: 32; 147; 131; 68; 246; 69; 145; 27; 148; 54; 37; 6; 56; 263; 63; 132; 12; 28; 144; 10; 90; 154; 2; 11; 15; 271(1)(b); 139; 92

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH; AMRITSAR BEFORE SH. T.S. KAPOOR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SH. N.K.CHOUDHRY, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A NO. 263(ASR)/2016 ASSESSMENT YEAR:2007-08 SH. SUHAIL KEDIA, C/O M/S MALI RAM JEWELLERS, MALL ROAD, AMRITSAR. PAN:AHLPK-4801H VS. PR. CIT(CENTRAL), LUDHIANA. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY: NONE. RESPONDENT BY: SH. RAHUL DHAWAN (DR) DATE OF HEARING: 08.03.2017 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 08.03.2017 ORDER PER N.K.CHOUDHRY (JM): THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF L EARNED PR. CIT (CENTRAL), LUDHIANA, DATED 17.03.2016. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING NO BODY WAS PRESENT ON B EHALF OF THE ASSESSEE, BUT THE LD. COUNSEL OF THE ASSESSEE HAD FILED AN A PPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE ABOVE CAPTIONED APPEAL VIDE ACK NOWLEDGEMENT DATED 12.01.2017, WHEREIN THE ASSESSEE SUBMITTED AS UNDER : I HAD FILED AN APPEAL BEFORE HONBLE BENCH AGAINST THE ORDER OF WORTHY CIT, AMRITSAR INVOKING SECTION 263 OF INCOME TAX ACT AND ORDERING A FRESH ASSESSMENT BY LD. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR. S INCE THE ASSESSMENT HAD ALREADY BEEN COMPLETED BY LD. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR, THERE IS NO PURPOSE TO PURSUE THE APPEAL BEFORE THE HONBLE BEN CH. IT IS THEREFORE, REQUESTED THAT APPEAL MAY KINDLY B E ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN. ITA NO.263 (ASR)/2016 ASST. YEAR : 2007-08 2 3. THE LEARNED DR HAS NO OBJECTION TO SUCH WITHDRAWAL. 4. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, THE REQUEST OF THE ASSESSEES COUNSE L IS ACCEPTED AND THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DI SMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 08.03.2017. SD/- SD/- (T. S. KAPOOR) (N.K.CHOUDHRY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 08.03.2017. /PK/ PS. COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: (1) THE ASSESSEE: (2) THE (3) THE CIT(A), (4) THE CIT, (5) THE SR DR, I.T.A.T., TRUE COPY BY ORDER