Yash Sugars Ltd, Aurangabad V. Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax -2, Aurangabad

ITA 263/PUN/2021

• Counselvise Citation: [2022] 106 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 5540 (ITAT-PUNE)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 9 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 19-06-2022
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Assessment Year: 2014-2015
• Appeal Filed On: 09-06-2021
• Result in Favour of: Matter Remanded
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH, ‘B’ PUNE BEFORE SHRI R.S. SYAL, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.263/PUN/2021 नधा रण वष / Assessment Year : 2014-15 Yash Sugars Limited, Plot No.18, Saraswati Colony, Rangar Chowk, Tq. Georai, Georai – 431 122 PAN : AAACY3092K Vs. Pr.CIT-2, Aurangabad Appellant Respondent आदेश / ORDER PER R.S. SYAL, VP : This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 28-03-2019 passed by the Pr.CIT-2, Aurangabad u/s.263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called ‘the Act’) in relation to the assessment year 2014-15. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessment in this was completed u/s.143(3) on 21-12-2016. The ld. Pr.CIT observed certain inconsistencies in the assessment order, which, Assessee by Shri Shubham N. Rathi Revenue by Shri Sardar Singh Meena Date of hearing 20-06-2022 Date of pronouncement 20-06-2022 ITA No.263/PUN/2021 Yash Sugars Limited 2 in his opinion, rendered the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue. He issued the first notice to the assessee on 16-11-2018 fixing the hearing on 30-11-2018, which could not be served. Thereafter, he took the assistance of the AO for serving the notice but such an attempt remained partly successful as the notice could be served only through affixture. The second notice was issued on 23-01-2019 fixing the hearing on 07-02-2019 which again remained unserved and was returned with the postal remarks `Left address’. The AO was requested to serve the notice on the assessee, which met with the same fate. The third notice was issued on 22-03-2019 fixing the hearing on 27-03-2019. This notice could also be served by the Inspector of the AO through affixture. In the absence of the assessee participating in the revisionary proceedings, the ld. Pr. CIT declared the assessment order to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue and remitted the matter to the file of AO for redoing the assessment. Aggrieved thereby, the assessee has come up in appeal before the Tribunal. 3. We have heard both the sides and gone through the relevant material on record. It is seen that the ld. Pr.CIT passed the ITA No.263/PUN/2021 Yash Sugars Limited 3 revisionary order ex parte. Several notices issued by him remained unserved. He directed the AO to serve such notices. The AO again could not serve the notices physically on the assessee but had to make service through affixture as the assessee had left the address. Thus, it is seen that the assessee was not available at the given address on which the notices for hearing were sent by the ld. Pr.CIT. This appears to be the reason for the late filing of appeal before the Tribunal by roughly 728 days. It has been submitted that the assessee had shifted from the given address and the order u/s.263 dated 28.3.2019 was received only on 08-04-2021, whereafter the appeal was preferred before the Tribunal which was received by it by post on 10-06-2021. In view of the fact that the assessee shifted from the earlier address which led to the non-service of notice issued by the ld. Pr.CIT, we are satisfied that there is a reasonable cause in presenting the appeal before the Tribunal belatedly. As such, the delay is condoned and the appeal is taken up for disposal on merits. 4. It can be seen that the ld. Pr.CIT disputed the correctness of the assessment order qua the receipt of share capital and the impugned order came to be passed ex parte. In the given circumstances when the assessee had left his earlier address and ITA No.263/PUN/2021 Yash Sugars Limited 4 the impugned order came to be passed ex parte, we are of the considered opinion that it would be in the fitness of the things if the order is set aside and the matter is restored to the file of Pr.CIT. We order accordingly. The ld. Pr. CIT is directed to take up the proceedings for revision afresh as per law on merits. The ld. AR has undertaken that the assessee will fully cooperate with the Departmental authorities in this regard. 5. In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 20 th June, 2022. Sd/- Sd/- (S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI) (R.S.SYAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT पुणे Pune; िदनांक Dated : 20 th June, 2022 सतीश आदेश की ितिलिप अ ेिषत/Copy of the Order is forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ / The Appellant; 2. 3. थ / The Respondent The Pr.CIT-2, Aurangabad 4. The CIT concerned 5. 6. DR, ITAT, ‘B’ Bench, Pune गाड फाईल / Guard file. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, // True Copy // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune ITA No.263/PUN/2021 Yash Sugars Limited 5 Date 1. Draft dictated on 20-06-2022 Sr.PS 2. Draft placed before author 20-06-2022 Sr.PS 3. Draft proposed & placed before the second member JM 4. Draft discussed/approved by Second Member. JM 5. Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS Sr.PS 6. Kept for pronouncement on Sr.PS 7. Date of uploading order Sr.PS 8. File sent to the Bench Clerk Sr.PS 9. Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk 10. Date on which file goes to the A.R. 11. Date of dispatch of Order. *