IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: C NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, HONBLE VICE PRESIDENT & SHRI K.NARASIMHA CHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO.- 2635 TO 2637 /DEL/ 2019 (ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2013-14 TO 2015-16) HEMALATHA JAIN, K-4, 11 PUSHPANJALI FORMS, BIJWASAN, NEW DELHI. VS. ACIT CIRCLE-44 (1), NEW DELHI. PAN NO. ACZPJ 6045P APPELLANT RESPONDENT ASSESSEE BY SH. MAYANK PATWARI, CA REVENUE BY MS RAKHI VIMAL, SR. DR DATE OF HEARING: 11/2/2021 PRONOUNCEMENT ON 11/2/2021 ORDER PER K. NARASIMHA CHARY, JM THESE APPEALS BY HEMLATA JAIN (THE ASSESSEE) FOR AS SESSMENT YEARS 2013-14 TO 2015-16 ARE DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDERS OF LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (APPEALS)- 15, NEW DELHI (LD. CIT(A)). 2. LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE HAS INTIMATED T HAT THE ASSESSEE HAS OPTED TO SETTLE THE DISPUTE RELATING TO THE TAX ARREARS UNDER THE VIVAD SE VISHWAS ACT, 2020 (IN SHORT THE ACT) FOR THE A SSESSMENT YEARS UNDER CONSIDERATION AND REQUESTED FOR WITHDRAWAL THE SAID APPEALS. 2 3. CONSIDERING THE AFORESAID SITUATION, THE CAPTION ED APPEALS ARE CONSIGNED TO RECORDS AND TREATED AS DISMISSED. 4. HOWEVER, THE AFORESAID IS SUBJECT TO A CAVEAT TH AT IN CASE THE DISPUTE RELATING TO TAX ARREARS FOR THE CAPTIONED ASSESSMEN T YEARS IS NOT ULTIMATELY RESOLVED IN TERMS OF THE ACT, THE ASSESSEE SHALL BE AT LIBERTY TO APPROACH THE TRIBUNAL FOR REINSTITUTION OF THE APPEALS AND T HE TRIBUNAL SHALL CONSIDER SUCH APPLICATION APPROPRIATELY AS PER LAW. THE REVE NUE HAS NO OBJECTION WITH REGARD TO THE AFORESAID CAVEAT. 5. IN VIEW OF THE AFORESAID, BOTH THE APPEALS ARE C ONSIGNED TO RECORD AND, FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES, ARE TREATED AS DISMI SSED. ORDER WAS ANNOUNCED ON CONCLUSION OF VIRTUAL HEARI NG IN THE PRESENCE OF BOTH THE PARTIES ON THIS THE 11 TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021. SD/- SD/- (G.S. PANNU) (K. NARSIMHA CHARY) VICE PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 11/2/2021