Shri Baldevbhai Theverdas Hariyani, Bharuch V. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Bharuch

ITA 2675/AHD/2013

• Counselvise Citation: [2016] 132 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 0116 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 11 month(s) 25 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 10-11-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Next Hearing Date: 10-11-2016
• Assessment Year: 2006-2007
• Appeal Filed On: 15-11-2013
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: ANTONY PARIATH

Judgement Text

, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SMC BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER ./ ITA.NO.2675/AHD/2013 / ASSTT. YEAR: 2006-2007 SHRI BALDEV THAVERDAS HARIYANI PROP. GANESH TRADERS, FURJA ROAD BHARUCH 392 001. PAN : AALPH 1014 L VS ITO, WARD - 2 BHARUCH. ! / (APPELLANT) '# ! / (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE REVENUE BY : SHRI ANTONY PARIATH, SR.DR / DATE OF HEARING : 10/11/2016 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 10/11/2016 $%/ O R D E R ASSESSEE IS APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL AGAINST THE ORDER OF LD.CIT(A)-I, BARODA DATED 27.8.2013 PASSED FOR THE ASSTT.YEAR 20 06-07. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF O F THE ASSESSEE. NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SENT THROUGH RPAD POST, AND THE SAME WAS DULY SERVED AS POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT SLIP HAS BEEN PLACED ON RECOR D. THE ASSESSEE HAS NOT FILED ANY APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT OF THE CASE. THEREFORE, IT IS PRESUMED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING WIT H HIS APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL, THEREFORE, FOLLOWING ORDER OF THE ITAT, D ELHI BENCH IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA PVT. LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DELH I), I DISMISS THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISS ED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON 10 TH NOVEMBER, 2016 AT AHMEDABAD. (RAJPAL YADAV) JUDICIAL MEMBER AHMEDABAD; DATED 11/11/2016